Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Blackmagic Ursa LF and MF cameras

Mike P.

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
4,344
Reaction score
32
Points
48
Location
Toronto & Vancouver
Ooouf!

LF is 12k by 8k (35.64mm x 23.32mm) and MF is 17.5k by 8k (~50.8mm x 23.32)... both include an 8tb media module?

Wonder if lower resolutions can still be full sensor like the OG Mini 12k.

For comparison, Alexa 65 is 54x25.6mm, but only 6.5k by 3.1k... and Monstro/Raptor/Raptor-X are ~25% smaller at 40.96x21.60mm and 8kx4k (aka half the resolution).
 
Last edited:
Very curious to know where it's going to sit price wise... Like if the Cine 17k ends up being only ~$20k (which is possible, as Grant said only the sensor's differ between it and the LF model), it'll do quite well.
 
During the announcement, I did add the Ursa Cine 12K and 17K as well as the PYXIS into my formatCompare and other PHFX | tools.

I'm excited to test out the 12K and 17K models. Camera form factor isn't great for my purposes, but I'll figure out of that is a deal breaker. It is a small pixel however and diffraction will be a factor, typically around T4 from what I can tell. I am happy they are including a Low Pass Filter. A bit concerned about image noise as well. Also need to see what sort of calibration procedure is required, but that's down the line.

Just format chatter. Ursa Cine 12K at 8K is about the format size of Raptor at 4.5K.

8K for 8K on both, Ursa Cine 12K is about a 0.58X crop.

12K off it versus Raptor 8K, Raptor is wider, Ursa is slightly taller.

And for the 17K, it looks like this:

Fairly close to 65mm 5-perf:

I'll ask BMD on Monday, but I have already been told the 17K is a "stitch", which we are familiar with. Don't know if the 12K is however.
 
Checked out the Blackmagic Ursa Cine 12K sample footage -


Had to install the latest Resolve beta, then change some project settings and do some other workarounds to keep the program from constantly and reliably crashing every few seconds while grading the 12K BRAW footage. But if they keep ironing out the bugs and I were to work within the limits of my system, I think the files would be workable.

The image quality is the best I've ever seen coming from a Blackmagic camera.

I can still see some quirky Blackmagic characteristics there, but nothing that would change my mind about the overall quality of the image.

I haven't shot any tests for myself with the camera, so there are still a lot of unknowns and possibly even some potential deal-breakers, along with all the other take it or leave it aspects that you get with Blackmagic camera's. But honestly, I'd put up with a lot of workarounds and drawbacks just to have access to images of the quality that camera's capable of capturing.

The larger 65mm/17K version of the same sensor, in almost the same camera body, will indeed be an interesting proposition.
 
A question I ask RED will also launch a full frame camera of those resolutions soon?
 
Back
Top