- Thread starter
- #321
rand thompson
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2011
- Messages
- 18,910
- Reaction score
- 615
- Points
- 113
I LIKE IT!! and I see you are using the Color Warper as well, alrighty then!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Out of Gamut Colors
I just released my actual Color/Gamma Transforms after testing them for a long, long time. Examining ARRI's LogC4 LUTs, the V1 ones, it's pretty interesting that some of the "old ways" are still apart of their color science and pipeline. If you look closely on how that material reads on the waveform and Vectorscope, the red colors are exceeding 100% IRE and smashing into the ceiling of both their SDR and HDR Outputs.
RED doesn't go this route for their transforms as they try to keep it wrangled within scopes and waveform.
If you want a general summary of the differences in the DNA of their Color Science, overall the most interesting difference I'd say and this has been true generally speaking for a long time, RED leans to a very accurate natural image with subtle perceptual choices while ARRI is aiming at a specific aesthetic. Previously they stated this was influenced by film, this time around there's a few notable changes that I think are more their own thing. Taking material from both manufacturers in and out of their color science reveals a lot, shooting tests reveals a lot more. Some fascinating differences between their old color and new color stuff too.
I'd be really interested in a "Write-up" if you have the time to do It. I've been basically messing around with how the the AWG4/ALC4 TRANSFORM LUTs react with the older AWG3/ ALC3 Color Space so I haven't yet seen these Luts true performance with the AWG4/ALC4 Color Space yet. Yeah, I can't wait to see what we all find out over the next few months about the similarities and differences between the RWG/LOG3G10 workflow and the AWG4/ALC4 workflow. But the AWG4/ALC4 workflow is basically just ARRI's version of the RED IPP2 workflow.
ARRI's new workflow being similar to RED's IPP2 workflow is a big step in the right direction and will minimize some chaos in post. I whipped up my transforms according to the white paper and a lot of math and testing. I'm certain Resolve will add this to their own CST plugin, perhaps even in the next beta. I do specify a different name on my transforms rather than calling them IDTs or CSTs. I use CGT mainly because you are transforming Color Space and Gamma Curve. I also take into account exposure compensation on some key manufacturer's transforms like RED or ARRI to account for 18% Gray being a different target. Actually helps a lot with studios using mine and other's transforms a lot to know who's you're using.
I just released my actual Color/Gamma Transforms after testing them for a long, long time. Examining ARRI's LogC4 LUTs, the V1 ones, it's pretty interesting that some of the "old ways" are still apart of their color science and pipeline. If you look closely on how that material reads on the waveform and Vectorscope, the red colors are exceeding 100% IRE and smashing into the ceiling of both their SDR and HDR Outputs.
RED doesn't go this route for their transforms as they try to keep it wrangled within scopes and waveform.
If you want a general summary of the differences in the DNA of their Color Science, overall the most interesting difference I'd say and this has been true generally speaking for a long time, RED leans to a very accurate natural image with subtle perceptual choices while ARRI is aiming at a specific aesthetic. Previously they stated this was influenced by film, this time around there's a few notable changes that I think are more their own thing. Taking material from both manufacturers in and out of their color science reveals a lot, shooting tests reveals a lot more. Some fascinating differences between their old color and new color stuff too.
I was listening to Harald Brendel on the Colorist Meetup podcast yesterday and he said LogC3 didn't have enough room for that extra 2 stops over so that's why they needed to switch LogC4.
Alexa S35 produces an 18bits linear signal and Arriraw recording is 13bit ( 12bit Prores LogC4 )
I guess now they need Log-to-Log transforms for LogC4 to LogC3 for Alexa S35?
Is Red working on a new color science as well? Like LogC4 equivalent?
Here is the short ''SWING'' Test Video made from the ProRes 4444 XQ file I uploaded that I tried to export out of Resolve 18 beta 6 yesterday, don't know if it looks correct or not on your computer monitor.
I updated all of the ALEXA 35 PRORES 4444XQ files on page 16 transformed from their ARRIRAW files originals in the ARRI REFERENCE TOOL for 7 more days.
https://www.reduser.net/forum/every...-be-launched-next-month?p=3794749#post3794749
Rand, the files are publicly available on ARRI's ftp.