Florian Stadler
Well-known member
As a longtime cml member (1999) and reduser (2007) I am elated that we are moving peacefully forward. Congrats Jarred and Geoff for taking a breath and finding common ground.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I usually shoot "flat".
And it has no effect on the exposure.
When the arguing turns to who's 16-stops is bigger, then it's a good day indeed.
I'm glad to be back here, thanks Jared.
Maybe we can now talk about this directly and calmly.
But perhaps the better question is, "Did they white balance on the Alexa?"
.
That green cast is OLPF issue and old color science i think.I was speaking more to the green cast that appears in the Dragon footage - especially the low end. The MX chip has always required a green correction in my experience. I grabbed these frames Dragon/Alexa 1.5 stops from the bottom exposure and pushed the levels up in Photoshop.
But perhaps the better question is, "Did they white balance on the Alexa?"
All of this begs the question of why this was never tweaked in the Color Science.
That green cast is OLPF issue and old color science i think.
http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?111400-Dragon-Flare
I don't think so. The flare issue seems to be a magenta shift.
Which is to say…?There is a difference between filtration (optical path) and decoding (colorscience). Both can change, and seem to change.
Did you white balance either camera in this test?
I don't think so. The flare issue seems to be a magenta shift.
Dragon is a great camera.
I totally get Johns perspective on the testing bit...
One of my reasons for posting images and not only charts, really.
Even if some do not get the implications of "tests", most people can recognize a tricky image...
It's not about numbers in the end...![]()
Shut up and shoot
![]()
I loaded 2 CML test RAW files to Davinci Resolve and compared Dragon Alexa and Epic footages.
this is what i found.
Highlights:
Alexa :+4.5 (A1) or 5 (A2)
Dragon : +3.5 (A1) or 4 (A2)
Epic : +2.5 (A1) or 3 (A2)
Lowlights
Alexa : -5 (B1) or -5.5 (B2) Noisy
Dragon : -5 (B1) or -5.5 (B2) Clear
Epic : -4.5(B1) or -5 (B2) Very noisy
A1: visible difference between lightest 2 bars - co clipping
A2: no visible difference between lightest 2 bars - clipping
B1: visible difference between darkest 2 bars
B2: no visible difference between darkest 2 bars
CML tests i used:
http://www.cinematography.net/UWE/index.html
http://www.cinematography.net/edited-pages/epic-alexa-f3.htm
Cool test Ergin. It seems that the way Dragon was exposed in this test gave it more clarity in the darks at the expense of highlight protection. Any chance you'd post some images?