Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Weapon or Alexa Mini - Help me with a hard choice...

Steve Conry

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Los Angeles, CA.
First let me apologize for how long this post became. Have a lot of thoughts and in the midst of a hard decision. Hoping to get all my thoughts out there and get some solid feedback based on wisdom and experience. I know this topic has been explored a fair amount and I am sure we are all a little sick of it, but I haven't seen much talk about it in the past couple months since Weapon and Alexa Mini's have become more available. As more and more information comes out about how each are fairing in the wild I wanted to see where things lie...

I am currently letting go of my Epic MX, which has served me very well over the past 4 years. It was the perfect camera for me when i got it and has been a workhorse for tons of projects. I am so grateful for the camera and how much of a game changer it was for our company, and of course to RED for coming into the market when they did and setting a new standard in terms of quality and price point. All this considered, I'm hitting a point where i'm becoming more and more away of what I need from a camera and have recently started to want something thats a little different. I'll start by mentioning some of the main factors that I am considering and how my experience with Epic has been.

COLOR - With the MX (and often Dragon), I find that i spend so much time in post trying to get color where i want it. Its usually the relationship between whites that look white, skys that look blue and skin tones that look natural that can be hard to balance. I've found that to get it right, it often means doing secondaries and other tricks, and even then i am not always completely happy with the results. That said, much of the past 4 years, we have been using ND's that have a fair amount of color shift on our shoots and that has likely been a big part of the equation. We often have 2-6 Epics going, and between the several different sensor, color settings, filters and IRND combos that can show up to a set, it can be a struggle to match cameras, let alone maintain a clean, natural look throughout a 3-7 minute piece. Recently, on the advice of some of the people on Reduser, I purchased some Formatt Hitech Firecrest ND's and noticed a clear difference between the cameras that were using them on the shoot vs those that werent, both for MX and Dragon. I do think this is a big step. However, I have always kind of had a problem with certain elements of the RED look. I have routinely been left unimpressed, even frustrated with the way the camera looks in shade or on overcast days (very muted and dull) and have often had trouble with the varying color casts that I find in less exposed areas of a shot. For instance, we will do multi-cams of live music performances, and all of the cameras will have different color shifts present in the blacks, and none of them usually look neutral. This can take a lot of time to balance out and before anyone asks, yes we blackshade religiously for all the cameras and do it properly.

RELIABILITY- Another issue i have found with REDs that is a little less common with other cameras, is that they have a funny way of acting up when you are on a shoot. On the whole, they have been solid for us, but almost every shoot, something unexpected happens and is at least momentarily cause for concern. Whether its the monitors not popping up when you power on and needing to be unplugged or replugged in (sometimes go into playback or shut the camera off entirely), the odd split screen effect that happens, Nikon mounts deciding they are either not going to change the aperture (or even sporadically racking the aperture from wide open to completely closed), random audio input hum, random corrupt fames, record buttons that roll for a frame and then cut (causing you to miss a take and get into a cycle of thinking you are rolling when you arent), random purple lines in the image, or the camera's refusal to switch to the redvolt when a Anton Bauer dies mid-take, there seems to be a host of things that make me nervous going into a shoot without a backup Epic body. I know many people will say they find the platform rock solid, but I have used dozens of Epics, and while they are amazing cameras that have been instrumental to my work, this has been a part of my experience with them as well. I dont mean this to become a debate about reliability, just to underline one of the considerations that is going into this decision for me.

ERGONOMICS - The Epic's form factor has really been such a god send to me. I love how I can choose to have as much or as little camera/rig as i need for a shoot. Coming up during the SLR craze, designing the camera to work essentially like a big SLR with redvolts, or a cinema camera when rigged up made the transition much easier and also really allowed me to work in ways that arent possible on other systems. The fact that when a production allows for it I can throw the camera on a glidecam and pull of shots that shouldnt be possible on such a low cost rig, and also rig it up with an Optimo and all the peripherals is amazing. This is something i am not ready to lose anytime soon. On the other hand, not having built in ND filters is a really frustrating thing at this point. Dealing with screw ons or adding matteboxes for ND's slows things down, adds weight and is generally a PITA. And then there is blackshading, which sounds like it has gotten easier but has always been tough with the Epics.

FORMAT - With everything i mentioned above about color considered, R3D's are awesome. I have gotten really accustomed to being able to fix white balance or ISO in post in documentary and music settings where you dont always have time to dial it in during the shoot.

RESOLUTION - Having 5k is often a little more than necessary, but being able to reframe, punch in, add post zooms and stabilize without taking a big quality hit has become a big part of my workflow. I think I could get used to relying on it less (it might actually make me a better shooter haha) but it is a consideration going forward for sure and i'd like to have some ability to do it...

All this said, I have been leaning heavily toward Alexa Mini because i think it checks a lot of these boxes.

It has really amazing color right out of the box... I've found that between the commercial LUTs (and others) and just simply shooting LOG you pretty much instantly have a natural looking image in just about any shooting environment. If you want to keep the LUT, do nothing and it looks great. If you want to go another route, toggle it off in premiere and do some simple primary adjustments. Amazing...

Reliability, not sure with the mini yet (maybe users can chime in?) but obviously Arri has a great rep here. I personally have never experienced anything weird when shooting an Alexa or Amira, so thats a big win.

Ergonomics, the mini is obviously not great in many ways... pretty limited options right now for controls (nothing as good as the Red touch) but soon when the standalone control panel comes out that should get better. And audio seems like its still a little ways away before its properly controllable, but does have a cleaner signal than epic from my experience. On the other hand, built in ND's and no worries about blackshading are huge. Just need to find a good battery solution for my needs, as they dont have anything quite like the Side Handle...

Format, I find the 4444 to be plenty for me, but do wish it was flexible enough to do WB and ISO in post--but i guess thats what RAW is for. Data rate just seems to make that less appealing.

Resolution clearly goes to RED, but by how much? The 3.2K is actually pretty sharp to my eye... It seems plenty for my needs, though will limit the post zooms, stabilization, etc. This is one of my biggest concerns...
 
Yes i managed to go over the character limit haha....:emote_headwall:

Continued:

So then there is Weapon... I am on the fence. It seems like they are figuring things out. A lot of the concerns I have with Epic seem to be getting better, while some of the crucial ones arent. I think the image seems cleaner, the color seems improved (definitely over MX at least) but perhaps not quite as dialed in as Alexa, the blackshading is improved but not eliminated, and DR seems to be getting higher. Problem is, still no NDs and in my limited experience with it so far, i have seen it being pretty buggy in a way that reminds me of Epic, in some cases worse. Then there's the whole ever changing product line of RED. It seems every day there is new camera or a feature that is added or taken away, a product that is announcement but may or may not come out, a timeline that is shifted (for better or worse), an upgrade with this caveat or that caveat depending on which camera you have and when you bought it or upgraded it, and so on. Its like you have to live on Reduser to keep up and even then its a bit of a toss up. I honestly love all the progress, but it is really hard to keep track. It makes me uncomfortable to be honest. You just never know whats going to happen, and while RED has been pretty cognizant of their customers, I'm not ready to do the whole "trust RED, they will always come through and you will always be taken care of" mantra of many RU's. Its not that i dont believe it is mostly true, but there have been plenty of times where people have blindly upgraded or had faith in one thing or another and felt a little let down in the end. I actually benefited from one of these times, when RED cut the price of the epic by ~30% overnight, but i know many people felt a little sour on that. I know you can find examples of this with other companies in different ways, but I do feel like things have never been so hard to keep track of and trust than right now. You have a whole line of DSMC2 cameras that have been announced for 1 (or 2?) years now, have been pre-ordered and upgrade to for a long time, that are still widely undelivered and now there is this whole new sensor path that is being teased with very little concrete information about what it is and how its going to work. I personally think its a little crazy that so many Weapon customers are just now getting there cameras, or are months away from theirs and Helium is already on the table. Im all for progress, and I dont really have much stake in the deal, but it feels a little wrong to me. For all the arguments for not slowing down the train of technology and being on the front line of progress you can make, an equally valid argument can be made about companies having a responsibility to customers to allow them to use their cameras and recuperate their investment for a little while before the next step comes along. Like would it have hurt to let Epic Dragons work for a little longer while RED could refine and build Weapons, or at least prepare assembly lines before announcing and taking pre-orders? And couldn't we say the same about Weapon and Helium? I am not trying to light a fire with this by any means, but it does make me a little nervous to jump in on a 50k CF Weapon when things are moving along like this.

Ranting about technology turnaround and announcements aside, the weapon seems awesome. And to be honest, I'm not sure most of my clients really care what camera we shoot on as long as it looks good and the work communicates their message. I think I could carry on with my Epic for years to come, go Alexa or Weapon and it wouldnt really matter. Its more about the camera I want to work with. And thats where I am torn. There's clearly no perfect camera... Where the Epic leaves off the Mini picks up in certain ways and same for Weapon. And where they all leave off, Amira and Varicam come in. I guess, I'll just go back to the first thing I mentioned. With Weapons and Minis becoming more available and users getting more opportunities to see where they are really differing from Epic, I am curious to hear from people that have experience with Alexa and Weapon. I really hope we can avoid the opinions coming from an emotional or brand loyalty standpoint and just talk about color, reliability, ergonomics, resolution, format and long term market viability of both systems.
 
So... To be clear you are asking others which camera you already prefer based on your arguments to yourself? You are right about The uncertainty of where upgrading a red will leave you in the near future. That can be as rough as it is a godsend. I hear Arri has a pretty badass sensor upgrade path. Just sayin'.

Good luck choosing. Both are seriously great cameras.

:ihih:
 
I mean I've made my choice obviously, but.......

In terms of camera body flexibility, the ability to actually deliver 4K, and a stable upgrade path.....

The advancements found in Weapon and DSMC2 bodies are rather real as well.
 
I own Both and the REDS get more work, the Mini is great but its expensive and the licenses are not cheap either. Clients love the Alexa look and the workflow is much better but the RED can do much more. Both are amazing cameras hard choice I would say a RED over the Mini.
 
So... To be clear you are asking others which camera you already prefer based on your arguments to yourself? You are right about The uncertainty of where upgrading a red will leave you in the near future. That can be as rough as it is a godsend. I hear Arri has a pretty badass sensor upgrade path. Just sayin'.


Good luck choosing. Both are seriously great cameras.

Honestly can't tell what parts of your response were genuine and which were facetious but I am not looking for someone to tell me what camera to buy. Just offering my experience with Epic MX and looking to have a discussion about the current options in the 50-60k range.




I mean I've made my choice obviously, but.......


In terms of camera body flexibility, the ability to actually deliver 4K, and a stable upgrade path.....


The advancements found in Weapon and DSMC2 bodies are rather real as well.

Thanks Phil! Always appreciate reading your thoughts on Red and other products. And also for the tip on the Firecrest NDs :) Curious if you have had a chance to work with Alexa Mini and what your thoughts are?




I own Both and the REDS get more work, the Mini is great but its expensive and the licenses are not cheap either. Clients love the Alexa look and the workflow is much better but the RED can do much more. Both are amazing cameras hard choice I would say a RED over the Mini.

Interesting that the reds get more work in your market. I think out here it just depends what kind of shoots you are doing. Both are being used a lot, so sort of depends on the production/producer... In terms of cost, I'm thinking a usable Weapon MG kit is gonna run ~40-50k, while CF will be in the 60-70k range. Mini is looking like 55-65... so cost seems pretty close. The licenses are definitely a consideration but I'll likely wait till a job comes up that necessitates RAW or Anamorphic and then pull the trigger. Do you mind comparing the image a little? I haven't gotten to work with any Weapon files yet. Appreciate hearing from you given you have both. Thanks!
 
Thanks Phil! Always appreciate reading your thoughts on Red and other products. And also for the tip on the Firecrest NDs :) Curious if you have had a chance to work with Alexa Mini and what your thoughts are?

Yep, in London for a bit. I don't own one and I have "issues" with it that others have. It's not bad, it does have some nice bits, but there's a lot I'm not crazy about. Additionally, I only work in 4K+ and it's 2016.
 
I have 2 Forged Weapons currently and I've been with RED for about 4 years. From my POV, the Mini is in more demand in general with clients, however there are lots of them floating around already here LA. There aren't that many Weapons compared to Mini's. And with the sensor upgrades on the horizon, coupled with all the new features the DSMC2 body has, Im expecting more demand with RED. Personally, i feel the Weapon is a superior camera, it out performs when it comes down to overall image quality, and flexibility. Those are my quick thoughts. Its not an easy decision.

-Cody
 
In terms of color and what you can do with the image, I find the best way to really answer this is to set up a studio day, rent both cameras, use same lenses, and then compare them under the same lighting, match the specs as close as possible, run it through post with a good colorist and see how they compare. Then again, if you've shot a lot of both, then maybe you already have enough to go on. I just find that this A/B scenario works pretty well and actually is very useful later on if you have clients who are debating which camera to go with. You can provide them with tangible examples.
 
I've made a side by side some month ago.
Weapon was so much more of everything good about a camera.

The only thing I will say about the mini. Try changing the mag when you have a Vlock on the back. Seriously, if I want to keep the mini mini I can't change my mag ?
Weapon.

Arri without bug is a myth too. It's just not the same bug. I remember the Arri Logo stuck on display when switching to playback mode happens quite a few time.

Also you are comparing your experience with the Epic vs the Mini, whereas the weapon is not the same thing at all. DSMC². It's not just a brain.
 
Comes down to this.... Do you want to use it for yourself or to make money on it? The Alexa mini definitely goes out a lot more than the Weapon. I own both cams, And Ill say this, The mini has two things over the RED, Image quality and Built in ND's. After that, the RED system excels in everything pretty heavily. If you want it for you and don't care about making your money back, RED is the way to go. If you are really concerned about making money back, Alexa has a better fanbase in the groups of people with money.
 
If your only concerned about rentals go to Arri... but ... know that you will have purchased 8 year old low resolution technology which even a 3000 dollar black magic and several other cameras have way surpassed.
The life of the mini is already well over in tech terms the moment it was built, it was only made for the Gimbal guys because ARRI where worried people were starting to use other cameras and actually like them. They needed to fill the (small camera ) hole in their range.
Arri are struggling to match everyone else in sensor resolution , price and over all performance. Yes !.. there is nothing wrong with ARRI's picture quality and no body disputes that. But the the myth of ARRI colour science being better than the rest is just that... A myth. Colourist that actually no what they are doing can dig around in a 6-8k RAW file alot deeper than a much small 2.8k Arri file.

The Weapon is just starting to stand up and about to start running.

Anyways... I'm not helping I'm sure. You have to look at your core business, your rental turn over vs forward planing. It's not good buying something that you'll have to replace a year later. As the money you have just earned to pay it off is gone again in replacing it. My Dragons are 4 years old and have paid themselves off 10x over... and will do so for several years more. Even though RED are pushing to 8k sensors, the Dragons I have still over deliver my requirements.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't seem like a fair comparison comparing the experiences of a 1st generation DSMC body & the 2nd generation sensor to what's currently available from Arri. Sure I was having those same nightmarish flashbacks when you mentioned those bizzare happenings from the Epic body, but it's been very reliable. As an example, in Avid, pretty much the industry standard for Editors for years & years, in broadcast and film. Avid has had is own bizarre quirks... Sometimes mysteriously crashing and losing all your work. My 2nd most used short cut is Command+S. But AVID in 2016 is a whole lot better than AVID in 2012, maybe because computers are better.. just like the Red camera is better, products works its issues out with use.. let me just say this, digital cinema cameras are really just glorified computers...


As of today, I've clocked in over 110hrs+ so far with my new Weapon CF and it's been rock solid. Hardware is great. Love the new design. Everything's been sorted out for the most part with DSMC2. I know it's frustrating to wait, but that's just the way it is with a small company. Pay a little more for a better camera and you'll get stuff sooner. Ballers like Phil Holland do. Next up will be the Helium sensor and with that i'm betting those imaging and color complaints will be dealt with. But I'll still bring it into DaVinci and involve color grading in my workflow, that's just proper... as a sidenote conspiracy theorists would say, that's why DPs love Alexa, because there was a time when it only shot prores so all the color was baked-in and producers couldn't mess with it in post.

Now I personally would wait until the Mini is at least capturing in true 4K until really comparing it to a 6K Weapon. At 3.2K the Arri Mini is technnically unacceptable for networks like Netflix and Amazon Studios.. Now would said networks reject it if they didn't know it was shot on the mini? I dont think so.. but still risky and unprofessional, unless you have clients that are ignorant or have no delivery standards..

But in a few years the mini will be a similar product.. so I think it really becames about brand recognition and loyaty. Coke vs. Pepsi. I like to cut innovators some slack, when the DSMC body was released nobody had the balls to do what Red was doing.
 
Last edited:
I placed my order for a Weapon a few days ago. But honestly I will go with the Weapon. Now if it was the Amira or XT then that will be a different story :)
 
It depends from within your business and customers.
Alexa mini !! is not so much mini, when to be ready, I still prefer the classic Alexa.
The Mini only has a unique advantage of the internal ND for the rest Weapon is exactly the same and even better out of the box.
But then as he said MArk the colorist make much difference.
Right now if I had to choose again, Weapon wins than the Mini, definitely.
Maybe soon they will come the new ND without loss of light hehe;)
 
Ahhh the age old dilemma and what an interesting place to ask such questions. Id imagine a non biased opinion would be hard to find on REDUSER...

Believe me, I own and use a Dragon and I love it. Here in Sydney the ratio is about 85/15 as far as which system gets used on TVC productions. With content style shoots, there are a lot of Red owner operator one man band types but high end TVC shoots its usually always Alexa of some kind. There has been a real trend with anamorphic the past couple of years with the 4:3 sensor and now that the Mini can license that same aspect, more and more people are leaning towards that camera, especially for anything handheld or in cars etc.

I am in a similar situation. As I shoot mostly underwater on TVC productions and luckily in a position to exclusively use Dragon without too much resistance. I still dont really believe that the average tv viewer can tell that my shots were different to 'A camera' which is Arri. Perhaps the colourist can but then they would likely be happy with Dragon having more info to play with. Whatever.
My situation is i own a couple of underwater housings for my Dragon and hope to retrofit these for Weapon when the time comes but more and more I am getting pressure from DPs to shoot on Mini. I am Red through and through and as I said, lucky to be able to use their cameras exclusively on my shoots without question but I am sure I have missed out on jobs because people know I cant offer the mini in the water.
I have been in talks with Nauticam about dropping some money on their new Mini housing (which is freaking amazing) but I would hate to drop that coin and have the mini fall out of favour and some new camera be released that steals the thunder. I know with Red going from Epic to Dragon was an internal upgrade and did not affect my housing fit. Arri, I am not so sure and as we know everything with all these different camera companies is hush hush until BOOOOM here it is guys. often by the time the housing guys R&d and build and get something to market is can be months after a camera is released, which reduces its life expectancy if you know what I mean.

I will always offer up my Dragon or Weapon setup first and foremost but got to move with what the market demands right?
 
Last edited:
I had a mini on order and had a weapon on order. Went with the weapon, because besides the whole Alexa sensor fascination, the mini is a poorly designed camera to me. Also every mini I rent is bug heavy and one job I had two dead minis, one we were able to bring one back to life the other we had to switch out completely. If you want to go Alexa, the XT is the way to go in my opinion. It's ironic that the RED's are more stable then the Alexa minis.
 
So many old fables are being perpetuated today: "Ohh, RED cameras are so buggy, you need to have an extra brain as a back up." I can tell you that I have been working for years in high end productions and not once I had a camera fail on me. Ever. As you can see above and from the anecdotes that I have been hearing, is that the mini is the king of bugs these days...
When it comes to picture quality and not taking into consideration resolution (where the RED's obviously crush anything out there), the Alexa is a very nice camera. But so is the RED. They are slightly different. The Alexa has a slight upper hand on the highlight side of things. The Weapon has a slight upper hand on the low light side of things. When it comes to color, I fell (and that's my personal opinion) that the Weapon has a nicer, fuller, richer image. It's a slight difference, and putting both through a colorist, they can match quite well. But the Dragon sensor is a huge step up over the MX, where the Alexa did have the upper hand. And that's where that old misconception "The Alexa looks so much better and have better skin tones than the RED" comes from. But neither reliability nor picture quality old tales hold true today. When you consider all the other aspects as well, like the ability to rig and customize the camera, OLPF interchangeability, easy lens mount swap, resolution, raw workflow and many other things, RED is light years ahead of Arri. I made my choice and I'm proud of the images that I create with this amazing system...
 
Back
Top