Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Underwater Shooters Only

There is no question that Gates makes some of the best commercially available housings for use down to around 300’. They have a reputation for being well made and dependable. Are they the only water-housing maker? No. There are others, with various level of product use, including Amphibico, Equinox, Ewa-Marine, Ikelite, Light & Motion, Quest, and Sea & Sea. A quick check of large photo/video/film clearing houses, like B&H, will find you an array of housings for different uses, some real cheap (Ewa-Marine), and some real expensive (Gates). Most are designed for specific models of film and video cameras. Depending on their intended use, housings are made out of various materials: aluminum (most Gates), polycarbonate, carbon fiber, PVC plastic, polyurethane, etc.

How many makers will design housings for RED One? Who knows? Time will tell. Demand drives production. If Gates is designing a specific housing for RED One, it will probably be a good housing, but commensurately expensive. There will also probably be some custom options (ports, etc.) offered for Gates housings. Does that mean that no other manufacturers will offer housings for RED One? No. Does everybody who wants to splash their RED One need a $10-20k USD Gates housing? No. There are varying degrees of use needs, depending on frequency of use, depth of dives, etc. For someone like Camdiver who makes his living diveshooting, an elaborate, custom housing makes great sense. For those who will occasionally splash their RED One camera in shallow water, rain, or adverse weather, the needs (and expense) are entirely different.

For some reason this thread is only addressing deep water shooting, as if that’s the only need/way to splash a RED One. Not so. Since the early ‘80’s I’ve been involved with producing, directing, and shooting the in-water sequences of footage featured on action sports and adventure travel programs worldwide, that televise on multiple broadcast and cable networks. The world and regional professional sports tours of surfing, Jetski, wakeboarding, waterskiing, etc. have all required myself and my crews to have film and video cameras in the water. It is a critical camera angle that places the viewer right in the thick of things – essentially a POV shot as if the viewer is a swimmer in the giant waves or action. I’ve personally swam all over the world getting shots for our programs – yeah, in many risky locations (big waves, rivers, etc.). I also have several other world-class in-water shooters that I use. All water housings we used, and currently use, were/are custom housings made of fiberglass, carbon fiber, or aluminum. They have the ports we need for the lenses we use, and the waterproof throughputs for the external controls we need. They’re lightweight housings – but strong and durable. We have never used a stock housing from a manufacturer, and we have never used a housing designed for deep diving. Diving housings are much too heavy and expensive for action sports/adventure travel use. Horses for courses…

Where do we get our housings made? By a custom fabricator in the USA who has been making custom housings for decades. Trade secret. I won’t name him/them because it’s my private source, but if you need a shallow-water custom housing, and do a little research, you’ll find several reputable custom housing makers.

The number of RED One owners/users who deep dive with their cameras will be relatively few. I’d suggest there will be a lot more RED One owners/users who will be interested in a shallow/surface/inclement weather housing for their camera. I think there may be several housing manufacturers who make housings adaptable for that kind of RED One use – demand drives production.

Though I have professional respect for deep water shooters, and hire them for certain sequences in some of my programs, there is a whole different world of in-water professional shooting that is being ignored by this thread – and it’s the world of shallow water, action sports, adventure travel shooting that will be the most realistic way that RED One owners/users will most likely splash their camera into, rather than deep diving, which is a limited specialty use. As soon as the specs are finalized for RED One, and I decide on the lens (or lenses) I’ll use, I’ll have my RED One housing custom fabricated. Since I have one of the first RED One cameras delivered, I’ll undoubtedly be one of the first people in the world to splash a RED One camera - if not the first. I guarantee you the first footage will be 4k REDCODE RAW @30fps and 2k REDCODE RAW @60fps footage in huge waves, in the barrel, with world-class surfers blasting right by the camera.
 
Hey Gibby,
Fantastic address. I admit I am a bit blinkered when it comes to discussing underwater work. I tend to lump everything together which is obviously not a correct way to look at things. There are many facets of wet work all of which are equally demanding and require their own specific considerations. I once worked on a TV spot for the WWF (not the wrestlers) and one scene was the a water lever POV of an approaching (at very high speed) Jet Ski. I was in the water holding my housing at that time, a Sealux housing for a Sony VX1000, which was in itself quite a lump. I back up your declaration to users needing to find the right housing for the right job. Saves time, effort and in the long run a LOT of money.

My selection of housing is not based on cost but based on the practicality of operation to meet my own personal taste. Whilst electronic housings offer lots of fast solutions for cam operation they can also be prone to failure, something I wouldn't want to happen, to me or anyone, when filming in an isolated geographical region for example. Manual controls allow for field servicing or temporary fixes to get the job done at least.

I look forward to your initial tests, geeeez I'm envious that you'll be dunking your RED before me but hey, Kudos for getting in there at the outset.

Cheers,
Mark.
 
Cheers Camdiver. Myself, and my associate wet work shooters, are all surface-level, or shallow free-dive shooters. I have great respect for the added equipment challenges and safety issues of deep water shooting. Our workspaces are somewhat related, but also very different. Wet shooters of all depths can get ideas/tips from each other. In the case of RED One, we're not only using groundbreaking technology inside the housings (RED One, REDCODE RAW, etc.), but we're also using cutting edge technology in the form of housings. Sharing ideas for housings, lenses, etc. is critical, thus I do appreciate this thread. I posted my thoughts because I felt that forum users should realize there are basically two different, but related workflows to wet work shooting: deep water submersion shooting using scuba, and shallow/surface water shooting for sports and adventure travel subjects. Both are somewhat related, but the technology demands (housings, lights or lack thereof, lenses, filters, drives, etc.) can be very different.

The cool thing is that this REDUser forum gives us a chance to compare ideas as we approach being the first ones on the planet to dunk our RED One cameras! Let's keep this thread, and ones like it, going so we have a way to compare notes and ideas for the common good. If I need a good deep water RED One shooter for a project, I'll contact you. I've lived by the ocean most of my life and it's my favorite subject to shoot - wildlife, waves, sports, etc. Producing and directing is enjoyable (and necessary) to me, but there is nothing like personally heading out to shoot some good images - and even better if those images are on or in the ocean!

When in Los Angeles recently, I went to an IMAX theater and saw Greg MacGillveray's IMAX film Deep Sea 3D. As I sat there watching that remarkable film, with my 3D glasses on, and fantastically filmed sea creatures swimming right off the screen in front of my face, it was an entirely euphoric experience - almost like a drug, but much better! They had some insane surface-level shots in there too - unbelievable stuff! I was mesmerized...

Those of us, who dunk RED One cameras, whether it is surface water or deep water, will be recording the next generation of in-water images for the world to enjoy. Hopefully those images will take viewer's breath away, similar to my reaction as I watched Deep Sea 3D in IMAX. Whether the images are 3D or not, hopefully their visual impact will stun the audience and help them appreciate the beauty of the world's seas and their wildlife...and move them to lend a hand to help preserve them.
 
Hey Gibby,
Nice words. I do feel that many people appreciate the Ocean more than they realize. Many of the TV manufacturers select underwater or natural history montages to showcase new models, new screens and new technology. There is an unwritten affinity in all of us with the Ocean that draws people to wonder at its complexities, to marvel at its denizens.

It does take a lot of material considerations to take our cameras down but in the long run I believe it to be more than worth it. Not just from a satisfaction level for me personally but also as it allows people to see better, clearer images from place I choose to call my office. These images if used to educate people and change negative opinions to positive actions then I feel I am succeeding at what I set out to do.

For RED I have pretty much got my head around most facets of my requirements. I'm actually planning to work, as I normally do, in the acquisition of stock underwater imagery as opposed to full on production. I believe that route will offer me a break with regards to the financial outlay, apart from storage facility requirements. Mixed with potential commissions from producing entities will hopefully allow me to amass a very nice library of stock to compliment future documentary / film productions. The only stumbling block / minefield for me at the moment is trying to decide what format I will be working in and with that obviously the lens issues.

Cheers,
Mark.
P.S I'd be honored to be considered for any deeper wet work you may require in future projects.
 
how many feet :D

Im thinking Red could do deep not a simple housing for divers
 
Sorry if I came across abrupt mate, no offense intended and I certainly was not scoffing at you. Please don't get the wrong idea of what I am doing here either.

No prob, Mark. And it IS interesting to hear what goes on with a large-scale shoot. In fact, if you do any shoots around southern California, I'd be interested in observing. I have a divemaster rating, so I should be qualified to uncoil some cables or something. Shoot me a PM if that sounds remotely feasible and I'll give you my info.

Of course, with the undependable and often-crappy visibility around here, I don't know where you'd be shooting... I don't even really dive here anymore.

Gavin
 
Depending on depth the corrective lenses can cost more than the camera
 
I have done some shallow underwater work (20 feet and up) and a bit of pool work for CGI. I would be very interested in if there is a possible reasonably priced housing for this kind of work. I would want some kind of focus pulling ability with the housing and to be able to run a hdmi to video village would also be great (I have never run a transmitter under water or even just under water in a pool. Anyone try this before?). I would not use it a lot but if the price is right I would very much like to have a housing in my line up of RED tools.

Insight from you pro's in this area and experiences you have with different housings would be very beneficial.
 
New era of underwater color?

New era of underwater color?

If we shoot below natural light from 10 meters on up to 100+ meters with ambient light (fiji or palau) in 4k RAW will the possibilities of "true" color from the reefs be the output after the red workflow?

That is to say to eliminate the need for surface supplied lighting?
 
Shallow water work...

Shallow water work...

Finner

I own an equinox housing for a PAL PD 150 which I use as a back up system to my Gates Z-1 set up.

http://www.dive-equinox.com/ch_packages.shtml

These guys are smart and customer friendly and produce affordable housings (less than $2K?)

They would gladly make a housing for your red one package. Might even cut you a special deal if you can send them the camera system to design the housing for production. They are trust worthy having done this before for a mate of mine.

The only issue I would be concerned with is optics. Mysterium sensor, your Nikon wide angle lens and 4k or 2k all looking thru a 6" acrylic dome. Might work very well for your applications?
 
we are also planning on getting our RED wet. Luke Inman from London UK is our underwater expert & camera man. Gates is also our brand of choice, nice to read they're already into the development of this housing.

I hope this thread turns into an info resource on this matter, great idea!

Cheers!
 
These guys are smart and customer friendly and produce affordable housings (less than $2K?)

Speaking of Equinox, I paid less than US$1300 shipped for my housing (the ProPak 8 for my DVX100) a few years ago. It was nice to have... But it didn't fit my HVX200 - need their EQ housing for that and it's over $3K. I wonder if they'll have something for RED? I would like a housing for RED, but it's really just something I would like to have if the price is right... It would see shallow water use mostly... The deepest it would ever go might be about 100ft or so if I ever took it out diving.
 
Hi Stokestack, thanks for understanding.

Sala Tar - "Depending on depth the corrective lenses can cost more than the camera".
Not quite sure I understand at what you are saying here? Corrective lenses to serve what purpose?

Finner - RED One is going to be a very unique camera as we are all aware. I think it will take a while for the housing market to get up to speed with regards to available wet bags / housings for it. That said, and when things are running smoothly, I would imagine your best bet for pool work would be either a splash box or an EWA Marine wet bag. I am not aware if either would have an HDMI out / access port through the bulkhead / structure. I would hazzard a guess at this point that any shallow water (down to 20ft) housing would have to be custom designed if weight and cost is your main issue. Seeing as RED is unique I believe any housing requirement outside of the bulky underwater ones intended for deeper applications would have to be designed to your specific needs, potentially expensive at the outset but once ready you'll be able to provide a valuable service. Saying that though I am pretty sure that most future offerings from housing manufacturers such as Gates, Amphibico, Pace (If they get into it) Equinox and Sealux aimed at supporting RED will have HDMI out ports for surface monitoring. Focus pulling is the act of keeping the camera in focus (sorry for my ignorance to the film world terminology) right? I guess that will be down to the operator manipulating the manual / electronic commands provided by the housing. This is all still speculation as we await the physical camera.

Sharkguy - Personally, others may differ but this is just me, I prefer lighting. I try to get away without lighting down to a max of 20m but after that it is imperative for good lighting. I live by the rule that too much light can be sorted out in post but at the other end of the scale with no lighting at depth, there's not a lot you can do to rescue a 'gained out to the max' image IMVHO. You may be interested to hear that two companies, Nuytco and Halcyon, are now producing 200w diver portable HMI units. 5600 degrees kelvin with an autonomy of 40 minutes (the Nuytco option can be dialed down to 100w to run 70 mins). Mind you they are not cheap, circa $6000 per light. I have a surface supplied 1200w HMI option (2x600w) but its a pain in the butt, not to mention very constrictive with only 300ft of power cable per head. We have a particularly impressive shallow cave system here in Palau and thus far with the surface supplied system have only really been able to light the first chamber. Looking forward to getting the Nuytcos as there are some amazing potential sequences to be had when I start messing around with lighting angles etc.

Luis - Let's keep the dialog going. Hopefully it will result in becoming a good source for all RED Dunkers.

AppliedVisual - Never used Equinox but I am aware of them. A friend was shooting here in Palau with one recently using an FX1. Due to humidity buildup he could film the first 10 minutes of his dive then his unit kept fogging big time. He was prepping his cam in an AC environment. We stuffed every available air space with silica gel packs which solved the problem but made his unit sound like a babies rattle every time he swung it around with intent. Not a bad housing, served its purpose.

Cheers all,
Mark.
 
Guys, this is an excellent thread and I love the input from people all over the world. When we get our hands on Red, I am sure this will be a great place to throw ideas around and get the systems dialed in just the way we like them. Hopefully learn from each other and shoot some amazing underwater footage. Keep the Underwater thread going!
Best,
Jason
 
Gibby thanks for those great posts :)

My maximum depth is likely to be 15ft so a much cheaper underwater unit would be great. I tried one of those plastich ewa marine things on an xm2 i had. I did not like them and felt they would leak at any time. A well made solid unit for shallow diving priced at around 2-3k would be just fine for me.

Michael
 
I think Splash boxes would be better options than EWA marine, that's not to say that EWA Marine's product doesn't perform. It may just be a bit limiting where RED is concerned if ever they do actually attempt a product for the camera. Tough acrylic with the basic controls, normally good for 10 to 15m. I guess the best option for all potentially custom designs will have to wait until we actually get RED shipping. I'm sure then will dawn the era of third party support options, custom wet housings included.

Best,
Mark.
 
Diving Coco's island

Diving Coco's island

Ah! I'd love to take Red back to Coco's island (off of the coast of Costa Rica.)

Personally, I prefer shooting large schools of fish, and seeing schools of hundreds of hammerhead sharks in 4K would be nice. I guess IMAX did some of this high-res work, but it would be amazing to be able to do it with a small(er) camera!

In regards to lighting, you can't get the proper color, even with a fast camera, since so many wave lengths have been absorbed before they even get to your lens, or the object you're filming. BUT, it will be interesting to see if RED would allow filming with less artificial light. (Pixel binning, etc?)

I love disruptive technology,

-Jerry
 
My maximum depth is likely to be 15ft so a much cheaper underwater unit would be great

Totally agree ... that's my aim too ;-)

EWA bags are quit terrible (IHMO). Splash zone stuff is ok, but I would not like to stick it 1 inch underwater :D

My ideal would be separate body shell and ports; the port housing the lens control so that it could support a number of 'typical' lenses for u/w work.

Somebody a while back suggested the use of the Nikonos 15mm ... optically this could be quite brilliant, however will not provide a 90 degree FOV (which is personally my target at the wide end).

As you've all said so far, optics will be the most challenging part.

Keep this post alive :)
 
Hi,
Jerry - I think down to about 8m or so would be fine. I can do that no sweat with regular HDV cameras. I normally white balance through a corrective filter and there you have fantastic color, no orange tinge - of course a nice sunny day helps too. Wondering if RED will be sensitive enough to do that without corrective filters, or if we should work with CC filters to begin with? White balance when shooting 4K is done in post anyway so there's where you get your "look". However saying that water is water is water. It absorbs light and wavelength so damn fast which leads me to believe that irrespective as to whether RED will be the all singing all dancing solution I really can't see that we could be looking at a reduction with regards to underwater lighting needs - the spending goes on......:( ........ Oh yeah, Cocos is on my agenda with RED sometime, somehow.

Hi David,
I think there are quite a few people here at REDUSER who intend to do surf zone stuff. Some / many are also based in California. I seem to remember watching an amazing Surfing movie "Stepping into Liquid" a follow up to "The Endless Summer" and the underwater scenes, shot on F900's I believe, were simply stunning. The filmmakers were California based. The housings were made by a one man show operation in Hawaii I think, maybe someone here knows more about him. I don't have access to the film here in Palau but in the 'Special Features' on the disc, the 'Making of' segment names the housing manufacturer, just some quiet Hawaiian dude who sits in his garage making housings for surf cameraman. I really think that all shallow / surf zone housing options will have to be commissioned on an individual basis. It seems that many people here have different ideas for applications of their RED's so that's gonna really determine the design and build of the units. So you just intend staying shallow with your RED?

Cheers,
Mark.
P.S My memory is a bit frazzled with regards to the housing manufacturer location as mentioned so don't be surprised if its an Hawaiian living in Cali or a Californian living in Hawaii, or a Hawaiian living in Hawaii......too much pressure.
 
W/B Issues

W/B Issues

The last post ties in nicely with another very important issue for us wet shooters / White Balance.

I'd like to get feedback on the common techniques each of us use. For me I use a bastardized 'Expodisc' which I retrofitted to fit into the protective lens cover of my dome ports, see below. I bought the neutral 4" version and just sunk that into the plastic cover. The inside layer is a regular brilliant white plastic sheet.

However I have often thought that manual white balance can be a sticky issue underwater. We are basically shifting pixel temps underwater to make a better image. In a static position clouds can play havoc with sequences especially if its something unique - W/B set at the beginning of the sequence then a cloud interrupts filming at the precise point when the baby whale shark head emerges!! Descending too is also a big consideration. I normally reset W/B every 5 m or so on my descent but it does get to a point, 90fsw and below, where it just doesn't serve any purpose.

With RED shooting at 4K we take care of W/B in post so thats a no brainer. Will W/B operation be a one touch action with RED? Any input from RED team would be great.

Cheers,
Mark.
Here's the Expodisc sunk into my Dome Port protection.

55_1170198305.jpg
 
Back
Top