- Banned
- #1,821
Pawel Achtel
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 3,648
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Tasmania
- Website
- www.achtel.com
Do you really have to take every post as an opportunity to twist it into an argument for your deepX?
Mike, My post had nothing to do about DeepX and didn't mention or referred to DeepX in any way, yours did. I was responding to hypocrisy of Ross' post and referring to what he said. I guess regardless of what I post, you see an argument for DeepX in it.
...And of course if he could go wider he would. Does it leave room for an argument for side by side Nikonos epics with its massive interaxial? Yes - just as it does for side by side GOPros (or the new sony action cam) with their much better interaxial than deepX 3d.
The angle of view has nothing to do with with interaxial distance. These are two separate things and I'm surprised you are confusing the two. Why you are bringing this issue for any other reason than confusion and "bagging" our products. For clarification, by "bagging" I mean posting incorrect information aimed at competitor. You have been doing this a lot.
BTW, for clarification, we offer dual DeepX with a wet beam splitter, another first in the industry, that does not have fixed interaxial distance and it is adjustable from 0mm to 50mm, offers 75 degree wide angle and fully resolves Epic sensor with no geometric distortions or field curvature and weighs less than 30kg. It is all about choices. Can you explain how 0mm -50mm interaxial is bigger than a Go Pro, because I think you have no idea what you are talking about?
It is pretty sad to read your constant trolling and attacks on me, our company and products, in circumstances when your customers are writing to me upset saying that you do not respond to their emails and refuse to fix your faulty products.