Bill Anderson
Well-known member
I'm looking forward to the films Soderbergh will make during his retirement. ( ;
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You are right Mike.
But for me EPIC is the real 35mm alternative. Like Jim said EPIC is the first digital camera to beat film in every way. The small size allows you to shoot with no crew if that's what you wan't. Very "Micro Budget". And you can buy the EPIC-S which is almost 50% cheaper than the original R1 "M".
I wonder if Peter Andrews will retire as well?
Yes, you can make a nice one man band shooting configuration with the R1. ;-) But still, I would be happier with an EPIC rig. Much smaller and more hand-holdable.I would argue that this is the case with the Red One right now. You can easily strip the R1 down into a one man band shooting configuration. R1 M-X is more expensive than an Epic-S will be, so on price alone you might be able to make the argument. And sure, the Epic form factor will be much more hand-holdable than R1. I will say this, filmmakers who are able to make great films with no crew are a rare bunch. In my opinion, collaboration is what makes films great a lot of the time. Even if it's a 2 or 3 person crew. Making films by yourself requires great skill in many areas, and also means you need exceptional ability to be able to handle the technical requirements at the same time as the directing. Some have pulled that off. Many others have failed.
Hehe... Me too.I'm looking forward to the films Soderbergh will make during his retirement. ( ;
I trust an artist retirement as much as a rattlesnake in a cave...
How about we hold our tongues until we hear directly from Steven. He is a friend of mine...
Jim
How about we hold our tongues until we hear directly from Steven. He is a friend of mine...
Jim
Uhhhh.... Didn't the Red One already do that 3 years ago? Last I checked, Epic costs almost 50% more than the Red One. Not exactly encouraging "micro budget cinema."
Now, if you want to substitute "Scarlet" for "Epic" I might agree with you.
Well, a lighter more compact camera might save you some money... or at least some time.
IBloom
I'm looking forward to the films Soderbergh will make during his retirement. ( ;
Very true Francis...I don't know Steven personally but I admire his films. There could be many reasons why someone who has giving 110% of their time and energy towards something and feels that it's time to go on to something else. I became a father at the very top of my career and decided to stop shooting in order to "be around." Now, eight years later I'm back shooting and loving it. I wouldn't of traded those "lost years" for anything. There could be many reasons, some of which, we might not never know. Let's wait and see. He is one of our greatest filmmakers.
Sounds good to me...I've only been shooting with the EPIC for a matter of days - but IMO - even on a low budget film, the EPIC will save you time and money. You can work faster, no question.
For most people movies are things you watch once and then forget it and go to the next one. Just like hit music, you hear one song all over the place for a while and then it's gone and no one cares about anymore. In a way it's even worse with movies since movies are only watched usually once. Good (hit) song you will be listening for few months form radio and your mp3 player etc.If I remember correctly he also speaks about short attention spans and that audiences don't obsess and talk about movies like they used to. The impact isn't there anymore.
Well - that lasted long... -> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-14779398
"It's less dramatic that it sounds - it's just a sabbatical," the 48-year-old director told reporters at the Venice Film Festival.