Skyfall Trailer

[Tim Whitcomb]

I don't thing saturation is th right word... but its definitely another long line of overly TEAL AND ORANGE color pallets that Stu maschowtiz has been bemoaning for years....and since Im a story guy, uh, this looks like Bourne Identity starring James Bond

 

[Scott Surman]

GIVE DEAKINS AN OSCAR! its beautiful

 

[Bob Gundu]

All that neon must have been ridiculous to shoot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oINNiB5Da3s&feature=player_embedded

 

[Simon Dunne]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1074638/technical

Cinematographic process
ARRIRAW (2.8K) (source format)
Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format)
Redcode RAW (5K) (source format) (aerial shots)

Printed film format
35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision 2383)
70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (Kodak Vision 2383)
D-Cinema

So let me get this right. Most of it was shot in 2.8K, scaled to 4K which was the master edit format, then they scaled down the 5K RED aerials, only to scale everything back up again for the DMR IMAX print??!?!

 

[Jeffrey T. Morgan]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1074638/technical

Cinematographic process
ARRIRAW (2.8K) (source format)
Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format)
Redcode RAW (5K) (source format) (aerial shots)

Printed film format
35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision 2383)
70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (Kodak Vision 2383)
D-Cinema

So let me get this right. Most of it was shot in 2.8K, scaled to 4K which was the master edit format, then they scaled down the 5K RED aerials, only to scale everything back up again for the DMR IMAX print??!?!

Lol, this is a great question.

 

[Matt Garrett]

I really don't see a problem with that. I'm sure the arials are a small percentage of the movie.
A 4k master is the gold standard.
Doing a version of the film catering to the arials seems like a huge waste of time and money.