Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Scarlet example

Same sensor and a lot of the parts are the same, so the images will pretty much look the same as the epic on the same settings.
 
Fashion film for Interview Magazine--A camera (head-on) Scarlet, B camera (side) Epic--admittedly black and white but the cameras intercut beautifully. They're the same beast, just sometimes the Scarlet has a tad more noise in underexposure, correct with proper blackshade...

http://vimeo.com/56182701

Music video shot with no proper lights, no crew, just a scarlet and contax lenses:

http://vimeo.com/defranco/thecall

I don't think of this as "outstanding" but I do think it shows the Scarlet is more than capturing footage that's on par with Epic quality. Difference is compression, high speed, slightly wider field of view, and grey/black body.... and $10,000.
 
Nice videos Ryan. I liked your other works too. I feel like I am in a similar boat as David. I am also looking to see some posted stills from a Scarlet 4k at 24-30 fps. I want see how they look. I wonder will I be able to get the right stills that I want with some consistency. Ryan, can you please post some stills from your Scarlet 4k videos shot at 23 to 30 fps?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top