- Thread starter
- #21
Tyrone Braithwaite
Well-known member
The law is behind here though Will. What the law is saying is that they may return the equipment *at some point* and until then it's not clear that it's not coming back - then it's not theft. The insurance company however are more keen to call it fraudulent theft.
Obviously to me it's not complex, I'm owed £40K and the inconvenience, and luckily my insurance policy appears to be operating as expected but at the moment it's a bit of a waiting game, and getting a crime no. from the cops is a nightmare. Will keep you posted.
Obviously to me it's not complex, I'm owed £40K and the inconvenience, and luckily my insurance policy appears to be operating as expected but at the moment it's a bit of a waiting game, and getting a crime no. from the cops is a nightmare. Will keep you posted.
It's stupid this is so complicated.
You rented your gear, they never returned it. They TOOK it from you. That's theft, involuntary parting and most likely collusion. What else would it be covered under?