There should be a moratorium on comparing Scarlet to cameras that exist and can be purchased.
ABSOLUTELY.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
There should be a moratorium on comparing Scarlet to cameras that exist and can be purchased.
it could be nice from red to say if they are able or not to deliver the scarlet since the end of the year ... was hoping for a first model in september or some news .. but as i see .. nothing .. should i look in other brand ?
Where you gonna go, Panasonic, Sony, Canon? If you were convinced of the others, you probably would have made that decision already.
...
I've attended IBC 09, where I could finnaly put my hands on a RED ONE and feel it and it's looki. The word about RED was consensual. It's a good camera. The problem with RED is that it's never REaDy.
...
- RED has only one camera in the market. RED ONE, and that's it!
- The so desired new camera projects (there's still only RED ONE at the time I'm writing this), that made us stay put and drull while we waited for the marvel (marble) in the business.
- This is all business, both for RED and it's costumers. Time is money indeed! How much money are people going to loose, just because there are schedules to be met, but like Jim says "everything in life changes... including our camera specs and delivery dates...". Jim is absolutely right. I'm seriously considering in changing my decision regarding RED camera projects that are still yet to see daylight. Interstingly as it might be we always have the bills in the end of the month. Unfortunatley, that doesn't change!
- About other brands, why not? Who knows the changing future. Even Yoda said it was dificult to see because it always in motion... Why not one of those or others not mentioned here? If they are that bad, why do pros (like George Lucas) invest in them? Isn't that strange, to say the least? Other brands have decades, some almost a century of know how regarding making devices that give us and our customers wonderful images. Companies that built a reputation all over these years and therefore cannot afford to be wrong, otherwise they will loose their credit, their reputation, customers and their money. Once again, why not? And then again... Why not RED? Why not RED ONE? Why not the hopefuly coming new models everyone is eager to put their money on? Why wait so much to achieve the perfect thing? The development work never ends. Sometimes, we have to send something for people to see, try and make suggestions if applicable. Then you would tune your path into a new generation of products or updates that would be better. That's evolution. This cannot be done all at once. Otherwise rendering obsolence becomes obsolete by itself.
I know you want Scarlet and it's been delayed multiple times. But you sound like some bride who feels she's been jilted at the alter.
Red has a camera, and it IS "REaDy." Even in its incipient stage, movies like "Che" were filmed with it. And I just watched "District 9." Was that shot on a Sony F35 Red One impostor?
The problem is not that the Red isn't ready, it's that all these Scarlet waiters (me included) aren't ready, willing or able to plop down $18K on a Red One camera body that should actually cost them upwards of $80K.
Red hasn't let you down. It hasn't screwed anyone who's waiting for anything. You don't want to wait for Scarlet? Fine, buy a different camera.
But Red owes none of Scarlet waiters ANYTHING. They more than delivered w/ the Red One. If we can't or won't buy it, that's our problem... not theirs.
I know you want Scarlet and it's been delayed multiple times. But you sound like some bride who feels she's been jilted at the alter.
Red has a camera, and it IS "REaDy." Even in its incipient stage, movies like "Che" were filmed with it. And I just watched "District 9." Was that shot on a Sony F35 Red One impostor?
The problem is not that the Red isn't ready, it's that all these Scarlet waiters (me included) aren't ready, willing or able to plop down $18K on a Red One camera body that should actually cost them upwards of $80K.
Red hasn't let you down. It hasn't screwed anyone who's waiting for anything. You don't want to wait for Scarlet? Fine, buy a different camera.
But Red owes none of Scarlet waiters ANYTHING. They more than delivered w/ the Red One. If we can't or won't buy it, that's our problem... not theirs.
Just to clarify- this is not the release date. This is the date that Red will announce the release schedule, which could end up being be quite a ways off. Just don't want anyone getting too excited.
I hope I am mistaken, but I thought I had read that because Scarlet and Epic use ASICs rather than FPGAs like the Red One, they won't be as upgradeable as the Red One. If so, that might partly explain why Red considers it imperative that the new cameras are finished and bug-free before they are released.There have been several cameras that have come out over the last several years with firmware upgrade possibilities but none of them really took advantage of that and used it to improve the cameras. Just simple fixes and updates. Meanwhile, with RED the camera has gone through so many builds that add features, improve picture quality, etc, etc.
AND, all of those improvements and discoveries and free upgrades along the way go into Scarlet and Epic at the beginning. And, then we (hopefully) get to see it happen all over again. With more new builds and so on that continually improve the quality of the product that we purchased at no additional charge to us.
I believe Jim said the newer cameras would use a combination of FPGAs and ASICs (or at least not preclude the existence of the former).
But will it be possible to add new features to Scarlet and Epic to the same degree as has been done with Red One? Or is more "baked in" feature set the trade-off for cooler, more stable operation and a much cheaper price?ASICs are the end result of the FPGA hardware development process. They will still be software/firmware upgradeable just like any computer, much faster,cooler and more power efficient too.
FPGA's allow you to change the hardware circuit design on the chip via special programming software. Until they are programmed there is no circuit. Once the circuitry is optimised for its purpose, there is no reason to put up with the shortcomings of the FPGA's unless you only need very small quantities than don't justify making ASICs.
But will it be possible to add new features to Scarlet and Epic to the same degree as has been done with Red One? Or is more "baked in" feature set the trade-off for cooler, more stable operation and a much cheaper price?