Derek Carlson
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2016
- Messages
- 276
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Sounds like to use this RWG/3G10 in the meantime it's best to avoid any LUT and just do basic primary and secondary grading?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Graeme has already stated that a proper transform has not been released yet. Attaching a Resolve film look LUT is not achieving a proper or even sensible color pipeline. It is throwing things against the wall to see if something sort of works. I understand people's impatience, but any LUT is designed for a certain set of expected input values. LUTs are not "generalized" and somehow able to magically yield great results regardless of the input color space, the input gamma curve, or the input exposure. They are specific. The new Red color space needs LUT's that are designed for it, just as Graeme has pointed out (even though people here don't seem to be listening.......).
No offense, and this is all new so we're all learning. I did some work with David to ensure his experimentation would be valid, and as we go down this route we'll all be able to reap the image benefits of the new log curve and colour space.
I realize this is a touch frustrating that the first part is in place (colour space and log curve) but that the transforms are not. Given that we can get delays in SDK implementation, it's important to put these elements out first while the subsequent parts are being worked upon, but of course, even the announcement of the new colour space breeds intense anticipation!!
Graeme
Graeme, just trying to envision what this will be when done.No offense, and this is all new so we're all learning. I did some work with David to ensure his experimentation would be valid, and as we go down this route we'll all be able to reap the image benefits of the new log curve and colour space.
I realize this is a touch frustrating that the first part is in place (colour space and log curve) but that the transforms are not. Given that we can get delays in SDK implementation, it's important to put these elements out first while the subsequent parts are being worked upon, but of course, even the announcement of the new colour space breeds intense anticipation!!
Graeme
Graeme, just trying to envision what this will be when done.
Will we be able to take footage from different RED cameras that doesn't necessarily match visually while being shot in RWG/3G10, and apply the same lut to the footage of each and get a match?
So yes, I've tested with original M, MX, Dragon, and Helium footage. All works great.
Graeme
REDWideGamut and Log3G10 are coming to future camera firmware.
Graeme
nothing is shot in RWG, RWG is an output color space from the raw data... u can change that at any point to DC2 etc
This post of Graeme's is what I was basing my question on.
REDWideGamut and Log3G10 are coming to future camera firmware.
Graeme
refers to camera feed preview, like u currently have with RLF or RG4 etc and/or possibly Prores capture
Graeme has already stated that a proper transform has not been released yet. Attaching a Resolve film look LUT is not achieving a proper or even sensible color pipeline. It is throwing things against the wall to see if something sort of works. I understand people's impatience, but any LUT is designed for a certain set of expected input values. LUTs are not "generalized" and somehow able to magically yield great results regardless of the input color space, the input gamma curve, or the input exposure. They are specific. The new Red color space needs LUT's that are designed for it, just as Graeme has pointed out (even though people here don't seem to be listening.......).
So yes, I've tested with original M, MX, Dragon, and Helium footage. All works great.
Graeme