Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Reduser Sticker Contest

No photoshop, and that the red team should verify that you purchased the stickers for your entry.

WOW, how on earth are they going to be able to complete our cameras when they spend their time searching for hidden "photoshopped" stickers, and verifying who bought what?

I want my camera, and I don´t care if an image is edited in photoshop - I think it´s ok, but I believe one should be the owner of the copyright for whatever images one chooses to post!
 
Here's another one. This one's a photoshop, but it'll be replaced by a real picture [head-down, in freefall, geeking the camera] by the time this contest is up.
 
WOW, how on earth are they going to be able to complete our cameras when they spend their time searching for hidden "photoshopped" stickers, and verifying who bought what?

I want my camera, and I don´t care if an image is edited in photoshop - I think it´s ok, but I believe one should be the owner of the copyright for whatever images one chooses to post!

:devil: Good point.. I would like my camears as well. But if we are just photshoping that kind of takes the fun out of it don't you think. Wouldn't be alot more fun if we could se what people can do with actual stickers. Just saying I think it would make a more interesting contest. You also have to think what pize is at stake here. That think is going to be a very valued collectors iteam one day. So I just think it should go to some that took the effort to go out and get a real pic with an acutal sticker then someone at work on photoshop. Not saying that the photoshoped pics don't kick some serious ass.
 
I still vote for use of a real sticker. I won't hold the RED team to verification of legit stickers... Actually, that could violate some contest regulations in some places. Many state and local governments here in the USA require that most contests of this nature have a no-purchase-necessary clause attatched. But what I'm getting at is; I thought this was a sticker contest and not a Photoshop contest.
 
Two categories: Photoshoped and physical.
 
Photoshoped will be a prize of having your picture on the front page for a few weeks and physical would be the snow board.
 
c'mon guys...what if movies had that kind of limitation, no compositing, special effect etc.
-A
 
I still vote for use of a real sticker. I won't hold the RED team to verification of legit stickers... Actually, that could violate some contest regulations in some places. Many state and local governments here in the USA require that most contests of this nature have a no-purchase-necessary clause attatched. But what I'm getting at is; I thought this was a sticker contest and not a Photoshop contest.

I agree. If there was to be a photoshop contest, it could be alot more creative than just photoshoping a logo onto something. This is a sticker contest.
 
And how does one judge if a contribution is real or photoshop manipulated?

Doesn´t really matter what i think, but I would love some more guidelines from Jarred.
 
It doesn't matter, there are no "real" images in print, broadcast or film. You wouldn't call the oscars a shake or smoke or maya competition would you ?
-A
 
But I think the bottom line is this is a sticker contest not a photoshop contest. I think photoshop contest would be allot of fun and can be more creative. But if you can get a real sticker in a very special situation that might be good enough to win. That would be something special.
 
Poi Boy said:
It doesn't matter, there are no "real" images in print, broadcast or film. You wouldn't call the oscars a shake or smoke or maya competition would you ?
No, but any monkey with Photoshop or one of its many clones can paste a 36" RED logo on Air Force One. On the other hand, actually accomplishing that in real life may be worthy of a snowboard.

I'll wait for Jarred to lay down the law, but I'd prefer the requirement be something tangible or in the physical realm using an official red sticker or possibly a very close approximation.

If Photoshop and CG creations are permissible, that's fine. Actually that's great, I don't have to work nearly as hard... Probably better for all you guys if that's the case -- Because like I've said before, if I can pull off my idea, that snowboard is as good as mine. :matrix:
 
yeah any monkey ? I think you should spank your monkey for being bad. I actually don't really care about the snowboard but I do find it amusing that you guys think that something is less worthy because PS was used.
-A
 
yeah any monkey ? I think you should spank your monkey for being bad. I actually don't really care about the snowboard but I do find it amusing that you guys think that something is less worthy because PS was used.
-A

Err.. sorry man, but this has nothing to do with creativity or presentation of medium or any of that. Jarred asked us to put some stickers on some cool places and that is all.
 
yeah any monkey ? I think you should spank your monkey for being bad. I actually don't really care about the snowboard but I do find it amusing that you guys think that something is less worthy because PS was used.
-A

Allrighty, then... :ohmy:

I never said anything about something being less worthy because PS was used. The point was it's about stickers and actually using real stickers... Sticking them in cool places or on cool things. I don't think I'm alone with that reasoning.
 
Allrighty, then... :ohmy:

The point was it's about stickers and actually using real stickers... Sticking them in cool places or on cool things.

I think what´s important is that you own all the rights of the composition you´re sending...you stick or copy/paste/retouch the sticker into a photograph you shot about a composition/idea you created. Photoshop is just a tool...
 
Back
Top