Josh Becker
Well-known member
So I'm doing a bit of research on the Mini Mags in prep for the Scarlet-W I have preordered. Thought this information could be helpful to other people who are jumping into RED from another platform.
I currently own an FS7 and have 6 64GB cards (hold 33 min of 4K 24 each), so I could hold roughly 3 hours of 4K. It's not often I need to roll that long at that high of resolution, but I like to be prepared. Every now and then for doc-style projects, I'll get a day where they scheduled interview after interview, resulting in hours of footage in a day. My "storage conservation plan" with the Scarlet-W is to record interviews in 2K ProRes (25MB/s, comparable to 2K REDCODE at 3:1 but without the sensor cropping since it scales down from whatever resolution you want).
Anyway, I just wanted a nice way to visualize the cost savings as you get larger mini mags, you can see that it's almost double the cost per GB to buy the 120GB vs the 1TB. Note: I did an approximation for the smaller cards, they add up to 960GB instead of 1024 for a full TB. This is because it ended up requiring odd number of drives, mixing and matching 240 with a 120... I just wanted to keep it clean with buying sets of all the same capacity.
A couple questions I have:
The Scarlet-W sees no benefit from the red-colored 512GB and 1TB Mini Mags, does it? Looks like the camera maxes out at 140MB/s. So if that's the case, I wouldn't get any camera performance benefit from the larger cards. But I would get cost savings and potentially better resale value if I didn't want/need them in the future.
Any arguments for or against getting several smaller cards vs. fewer larger cards? In the past, I've preferred the "don't put all your eggs in one basket" approach... but comparing the 120GB to the 1TB, I could almost buy two 1TB cards for the price of 1TB's worth of 120GB cards! It does scare me to only have two cards though. SSD failure, loss, theft, etc. Any thoughts there? I think I'd definitely want at least two cards, because I'd never want to halt a shoot because we have to unload the only card.
I currently own an FS7 and have 6 64GB cards (hold 33 min of 4K 24 each), so I could hold roughly 3 hours of 4K. It's not often I need to roll that long at that high of resolution, but I like to be prepared. Every now and then for doc-style projects, I'll get a day where they scheduled interview after interview, resulting in hours of footage in a day. My "storage conservation plan" with the Scarlet-W is to record interviews in 2K ProRes (25MB/s, comparable to 2K REDCODE at 3:1 but without the sensor cropping since it scales down from whatever resolution you want).
Anyway, I just wanted a nice way to visualize the cost savings as you get larger mini mags, you can see that it's almost double the cost per GB to buy the 120GB vs the 1TB. Note: I did an approximation for the smaller cards, they add up to 960GB instead of 1024 for a full TB. This is because it ended up requiring odd number of drives, mixing and matching 240 with a 120... I just wanted to keep it clean with buying sets of all the same capacity.
A couple questions I have:
The Scarlet-W sees no benefit from the red-colored 512GB and 1TB Mini Mags, does it? Looks like the camera maxes out at 140MB/s. So if that's the case, I wouldn't get any camera performance benefit from the larger cards. But I would get cost savings and potentially better resale value if I didn't want/need them in the future.
Any arguments for or against getting several smaller cards vs. fewer larger cards? In the past, I've preferred the "don't put all your eggs in one basket" approach... but comparing the 120GB to the 1TB, I could almost buy two 1TB cards for the price of 1TB's worth of 120GB cards! It does scare me to only have two cards though. SSD failure, loss, theft, etc. Any thoughts there? I think I'd definitely want at least two cards, because I'd never want to halt a shoot because we have to unload the only card.