Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

RED failed me again

ah yes, mysterious hardware problems...

ah yes, mysterious hardware problems...

it's all depends on the camera batch actually. For example, batch 3 cameras is much more solid than batch 1 or 2. there is a rumor that the earlier batch have some issues in the chips, that would only show up with certain firmware loads.

Since you mention that- I have no idea what's inside the RED box so I really shouldn't be writing this.

But I will say that about 6 years ago, I was involved with a OEM product that used some large FPGAs (programmable logic- sort of a flexible, dedicated high-speed CPU). At that time, and I believe still, there were two main vendors of these chips: Xilinx and Altera. They both had competitive parts, so at the outset your choice might be based on design tools or how nice the company reps are, but later once your design is locked and the boards are fabbed it's not easy to change vendors.

Anyway, after some mysterious field failures we determined that the FPGA we used had some subtle flaws. I think it was the timing of some gates was not quite what the model said it was. Everything worked fine in our initial testing, but some of our firmware builds (after shipping) used different connections inside the chip and exposed the problem. We found that some chips worked and some didn't. When we complained to the company (I forgot which one it was... let's call it "Company X" :-) at first they ignored us (some speculated because we were a small customer.) The problem was really killing us and we kept at them, and eventually they admitted that there was a problem in manufacturing which might possibly have caused the problem but the newer date codes were good because they silently fixed it at some point (without mentioning the issue to anyone, or at least to us.) Gotta love those customer relations. :pinch:

Problems related to marginal timing (eg. internal "logic race") have interesting consequences. They can be temperature-dependent (timing generally changes with temperature). If you are right on the edge, you can get big increases in current consumption and heat generation of the component, when there is a transient driver conflict (two logic outputs fighting each other on the same bus line). If I had two supposedly identical FPGA-based systems, and one runs hotter than the other in the same conditions, I would start to suspect something like this (of course there are many other causes too).
 
I've been shooting different REDs, and they seem to be very individual beasts. Oddities showing up in one, not happening on the other.

I think I've been fairly lucky with my cam/build/generation, so far NOT having any other major issue than the batteryplate (which can render your cam usesless, but still all my boot related problems so far can be tracked to the faulty batteryplate design I hope RED rectifies ASAP).

I also had a build installation rot on me, but a re-install fixed those issues.

My cam has been going virtually every day since end of march, and I start to trust it beyond reason... :)

OTOH, I've become slightly weary when renting...
Not because they are unstable, just different.

I'm dying to upgrade to build 16, but have to wait, as it cannot be downgraded (which I find a bit frustraiting. It would be great to be able to workflow/stress-test build 16 and give clients a informed choice, without going totally either/or. Some would definitely risk additional hazzles for better images. Others needs it to "just work". Build 15 - with all its oddities - is still the closest thing to "just work" with a good DIT, as it is - judging from the posts)

Gunleik
 
known battery issue / policies

known battery issue / policies

"The battery plate can be super flakey"

1. Since this was even acknowledged by Jim, I'd like to hear someone from Red say that they are going to fix this design flaw and in the future it will no longer be a problem.

2. I'd like to hear a similar statement about "codec errors" being eliminated in future builds.

3. Lastly, in my former industry it was standard to send out a refurbished replacement unit if the customer requested it (next day or 2nd day air if need be). At the customer's choice they could wait for their unit to be repaired, or they could "hot swap" for a refurbished, working unit. This is a company policy/program of course. The unit could be requested and sent out BEFORE the defective unit was even received. If a deposit is needed, it could be put on a credit card. The customer paid shipping to return his/her unit, and the manufacturer paid the shipping on the replacement. If special shipping was needed (next day) I suppose that was given away to their biggest customers, but could be handled differently in the Red "consumer" situation, of course.

A policy like that could help alleviate a lot of worry and concerns about the reliability of the camera.
 
To the people that are worried about their upcoming numbers- don't be. When I was waiting for my #290 alot of the people from the first batch were freaking me out about problems with this and that. All of that stuff (that I can think of) has now been resolved - at no cost I might add.
And- I haven't experienced any problems... 8)
 
i had same power problem with my cam- total lack of power. happened while testing, not on a job, so not so bad- and red did fix it but camera total failure is never good.
btw I also had a Panasonic Varicam go belly up just before first shot of the day, despite full checkout day before. made me look bad. So it does happen, and can happen to any camera, but whenever it does it is never good.
 
Colin,

Horrible situation, I really feel for you. You're going to absolutely hate the solution but I really think the best thing to do is to have a spare body at all times (a lot of owners have two cameras for a very good reason - it's not a very reliable camera right now but having a back-up body is worth its weight in gold IMHO. We're doing a feature next month and there'll be a spare body (body only, no accessories) sitting in its box on the camera truck at all times waiting for its big moment).

Incidentally did you try rebooting your Red using the mains (either via the charger or using the Elpac adaptor). The battery plate can be super flakey so it'd be interesting to see if the problem persists with mains power. If the problem still persists it's probably some kind of internal fuse that's been blown - what power were you using before it conked out and how rough were the shooting conditions?

Having one spare RED body in the box, with no accessories, is really, really smart. In my opinion, it is still a beta camera. If you are doing a two camera shot, have a third body only RED waiting as back up.
 
Am I reading correctly? Some suggestions for resolving the original posters problem is having spare bodies? Live with the quirks because its new tech? Because a Varicam went down that means all cams are a crapshoot?

The original poster stated this was an ongoing issue of reliability. If Sony or Panasonic, et.al did this you'd all be up in arms asking for the CEO's heads.

Red gets a pass? Bulls**t. As fervently as build 16 was touted as the end of Beta, reliability should now be the one and only priority.
 
I don't know about other people, but I did not want to shoot my feature (we're a month into it now) without having two REDs on the set. For about the first two weeks, we were running both cameras all the time. Now, we're running just one. But there was NO WAY I was going to be able to have any confidence without having that one extra body. Indeed, earlier this week, someone moved a cable, and that RED was way up on a tripod, and the tripod started to come down. Happily, one of my grips managed to catch it on the way down (injuring himself in the process, I must say). My heart sank when I heard the words, "catch it!" But I also immediately knew we'd be okay on the shoot since we have that second camera system to fall back on (pun intended) for the film.

In my opinion, having two REDs is essential. We have a third one on order, but I'll be selling it. . . next month.

Stephen
 
Although it would be nice if each of us could have an extra RED body, there's a problem: it's not as if you can can buy a 2nd one from amazon.com at the moment, even if you do have the spare cash. And there's not always one available, even if you want to rent it (not everyone lives in L.A. or NYC).
 
"The battery plate can be super flakey"

3. Lastly, in my former industry it was standard to send out a refurbished replacement unit if the customer requested it (next day or 2nd day air if need be). At the customer's choice they could wait for their unit to be repaired, or they could "hot swap" for a refurbished, working unit.
A policy like that could help alleviate a lot of worry and concerns about the reliability of the camera.

I'd sustain such a policy, and I'm worried to see no post from red on all this.
 
Having a spare body is essential in our industry!

A very expensive Sony 750 went down on us during a shoot in a remote location in Morocco.

The folks who did the Mercedes commercial in Barcelona had three Reds and were very glad about it.

Nevertheless, I second the idea of refurbished spares from Red.

Regards,

Uli
 
Sorry to hear about your problems.

I just got home from a two day shoot with our Red on a wide variety of setups, shooting an Optimo most of the time with a slider, on car rigs, day ext./int. night etc. (This is great camera for rigging BTW).

We all came away feeling stoked about everything we shot. Seeing detail in windows that were 4-5 stops over, rich, clean blacks on a night shot at T4 wide open, rating at ASA 400. Everything exceptionally nuanced and rich.

Our camera has been rock solid and booted every time.

We had a second body on hand for our first shoot, and the camera was so reliable, we stopped having it on subsequent shoots.

It stands to reason that there would be variability on cameras, and probably some "lemons" that are sitting on the fringe of tolerances. If I had one like that that was consistently giving me grief (that wasn't something we could resolve), I'd simply ask for a replacement. And I'm sure Red would take care of it.

Personally, my hat's off to Red. And I'm proud of what this camera is doing. I put my neck out there as a evangelist, and I'm happy to say my experience so far has been great.

The only thing we saw today was a "fluttering" LCD, where the image (particularly the lower third of the LCD) would tear and remain unstable for a few seconds. This is the first time we've seen that, and will be investigating.

Hang in there,

M
 
Having a B camera body, even if it remains in a case, is a good insurance policy. Regardless of what system you're shooting (film or digital) most Bond Companies insist on having a back up. Production time is more expensive than the daily rental of a camera. The Red Camera has been an enjoyable experience for me, and the directors and producers I have been working with recently. The current director that I have been working with, Jesse Dylan (Bob's son), is in love with the Red. He bought a Red Camera last week. My advice is to trust the camera because it is dependable. But having a B camera body is common sense.
 
I used quite a lot the red of a friend of mine for personal projects (I won a prize recently) and when he rent it I'm usually on the set as red supervisor. His camera is around number 800 and it worked always well. The only issue is sometimes the joystick but you can fix it easily and a lcd cable that sometimes it doesn't give the power to the lcd but if you reboot the camera usually everything works fine. That camera is working in a lot of big commercials and music videos and everybody seems happy.
Red camera is giving me a lot of work opportunities and this is the main reason why I bought one (4353 sigh! But I wait with patience).
P.S. It' s a question of faith, sell your sony and your red will work every time.
Just kidding! :sarcasm:
 
Like I said we have shot 1 hour television shows, ENG packages (put on the news that night), :30 spots, Short Films, and anything else we can shoot, and the camera has always worked. We shoot at the beach, in air-conditioning, indoors, on jibs, on steady cams, and she always works. Tons of very satisfied clients.

I have some great footage of Scott sliding backwards down this 5 1/2 story waterslide over and over and over and over again with his RED...if that's not a test of the camera's robustness, I don't know what is :)
 
it's a bummer when ANY equipment fails you on a project ... really doesn't matter if that equipment works 99.9% of the time - if it doesn't work for on the day you need it ya just don't fell good about it ... i hope Red can get the camera up & running for you quickly ....
 
wow. can't believe how commonplace some of these issues are. my RED is now back at RED, after a month of ownership. i worked fine for a while, then stopped working. so far RED support has been amazing, and if they get my camera back in time so that my client is happy, i will be fine with the problem. if RED cannot get a working camera back to me in time to save this (six-month) rental, i will be quite upset. will know by today.....
 
I'll log another tech support ticket, and probably have to pay another $500.00 to get it shipped back to RED, only to get it back and have it fail on me again.
Colin


so when it fails and it is their fault - you still have to eat the $500 shipping?
 
Back
Top