Joseph Hutson
Well-known member
Here's a nice chart to compare sensor sizes...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It does, and the chart above indicates this where it shows the Mysterium-X chip as being in the Epic.the charts is great help !!!! correct me please!!! i thought the RED ONE MX...had the same sensor as EPIC????
the charts is great help !!!! correct me please!!! i thought the RED ONE MX...had the same sensor as EPIC????
Quite likely it will have some technology that allows truly variable ISO without penalty.I'm hoping for some more dynamic range and better colour reproduction.
Also less noise on the higher ISO's, but I don't want it to be more sensitive. 800ISO is a sweet spot IMO. Anymore and you're having to put too much ND in front of the lenses to get the stop down
I agree 24x36 for cinematographers is wasted real estate.
My expectations are:
1. It'll be awesome
2. We'll get more details when it's ready to ship
[EDIT] 3. a few days before 2. above, we'll hear 'heh heh heh' quite a lot, then Jim will post an image without comment which makes everyone wonder 'how the fsck did he do that?!'
Mike
I wouldn't bet on FF35. The 5D world wants it, some redusers want it, most any cinematographer doesn't want it. All our lenses are S35, 5K already results in soft (even vignetted!) corners.
Most ACs and DPs I've worked for dislike the fact that the Red squeezes so many pixels out of its sensor, while Alexa, F65 etc use more pixels to generate a smaller final result with more accurate/stable color reproduction. If Red announced an improved bayer pattern, more intelligent photo sites, etc, that would make total sense to every professional Red-basher.