David Battistella
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
- Messages
- 10,003
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
Some people really seem to underestimate how important the post workflow is in this camera's success.
Haakon,
I can not agree with you more. Beyond making fantastic images I think that red has to make it SUPER EASY for users to access the highest possible quality images from the camera. (even though I know it is inherently more time consuming to create DPX files or tiff sequences, etc.)
Peoples' (potential clients ) patience will run thin and they will shoot on other formats for simplicity (in specific markets but this will always be true).
A half debater QuickTime to Prores does not do this camera justice (even though it looks amazing) and the fact that a private citizen in NYC is currently providing the best post solution does not really cut it (but I agree that it is awesome that it is happening and this is part of what makes RED great).
I hope and believe that Red has been focusing on build 16, but the plan will now be to find a way to have us access the best quality image from the r3d file though various software programs (with SDK development I am sure that this is the intention). We bought the camera for the quality of those images not the QT proxies (but it is great to have the QT reference).
I've heard far to many grumblings about "no post work flow" (amoung Toronto producers and LARGE post operations) and they should not have to buy scratch to answer the bell (they just want an easy way to plug RED into existing work flows and it is true that the back half of the workflow (RedCine) does not even have documentation, recommended computer system configurations, v-out, etc)
David
EDIT: I wanted to clarify some of what was in this post because I typed it on my iphone and I did not feel I was as clear or as positive as I had intended it to be. I would do anything I can to help the RED team on the post end.