Stivan Widick
Well-known member
Breath bated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Certainly surprising results. I won't spill the beans, but there's a new "good option" for IR protection.
Yeah. That's weird isn't it? I was waiting on some folks to publish that test a while ago. I've mentioned it on Reduser elsewhere, but......
After extensive (and boy do I mean extensive) testing I can recommend two IR/ND solutions for Mysterium-X sensors.
They are:
- Tiffen Hot Mirror IRND Filters - (filmtools link)
- Formatt Hot Mirror/Neutral Density Filers - (B&H link)
The Tiffens come in the range of 0.3-2.1. The Formatts go from 0.3-2.4.
As of this day, 04/23/2013, the Tiffen HMIRND provide the "best" possible image out of camera with the Mysterium-X under daylight and tungsten. The Formatts are close though and a bit cheaper for the set.
I had a full set of Formatt HMND filters in 77mm screw on and 4x5.65. The 77mm work well on still lenses. My Formatts 4x5.65s were magically transported away from me recently. At the end of next week I'm ordering a range of Tiffen HMIRND glass.
Dragon Thoughts: The new Red Dragon sensor and bodies will have enhanced IR protection through a new IR-OLPF design. Once I have a Dragon in my hand I will test literally everything all over again. It's said that we may not need IR protection due to the new tech, but until the testing is done we can't know for sure. For Dragon we'll likely be looking for filtration needs in the 0.03-3.0 range, which is nice because the Motion Mount covers exactly that range and everything in between. I'm sure the IR-OLPF will help or solve the IR pollution (or perhaps some combination of the new color science may assist with this). Where I'm concerned is deep filtration like 1.8-3.0.
Expect some fairly thorough tests again soon.
Question: With the IRND combo filters ... Is there any issues with stacking? Technically you are doubling up on the IR .
So the new Formatt ProStops didn't claim the crown despite their paper superiority - or were they not part of the test?
Yeah. That's weird isn't it? I was waiting on some folks to publish that test a while ago. I've mentioned it on Reduser elsewhere, but......
After extensive (and boy do I mean extensive) testing I can recommend two IR/ND solutions for Mysterium-X sensors.
They are:
- Tiffen Hot Mirror IRND Filters - (filmtools link)
- Formatt Hot Mirror/Neutral Density Filers - (B&H link)
The Tiffens come in the range of 0.3-2.1. The Formatts go from 0.3-2.4.
As of this day, 04/23/2013, the Tiffen HMIRND provide the "best" possible image out of camera with the Mysterium-X under daylight and tungsten. The Formatts are close though and a bit cheaper for the set.
I had a full set of Formatt HMND filters in 77mm screw on and 4x5.65. The 77mm work well on still lenses. My Formatts 4x5.65s were magically transported away from me recently. At the end of next week I'm ordering a range of Tiffen HMIRND glass.
Dragon Thoughts: The new Red Dragon sensor and bodies will have enhanced IR protection through a new IR-OLPF design. Once I have a Dragon in my hand I will test literally everything all over again. It's said that we may not need IR protection due to the new tech, but until the testing is done we can't know for sure. For Dragon we'll likely be looking for filtration needs in the 0.03-3.0 range, which is nice because the Motion Mount covers exactly that range and everything in between. I'm sure the IR-OLPF will help or solve the IR pollution (or perhaps some combination of the new color science may assist with this). Where I'm concerned is deep filtration like 1.8-3.0.
Expect some fairly thorough tests again soon.
Anybody tried the Platinums on the newer sensors? Ive got a helium but shoot on dragon from time to time?