- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #21
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 13,392
- Reaction score
- 796
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- www.phfx.com
To that point Blair it is all about "doing it right" or at least doing it pretty well.
If we're talking cinema level viewing experience the bitrates to support that DCI level bitrate we need to hit that 31.25MB/s DCI 4K 12-bit spec. We're just getting there shortly with premium internet to deliver anything like that with overprovisioning.
That said, the UHD 4K (and even 8K) that Netflix, Amazon, and YouTube provide is not terrible. In fact that's the best streaming high resolution content the masses have access to at the moment. But that of course requires hardware and an internet connection to support the bandwidth. Oddly I'm sadly unimpressed by some aspects of UHD Blu-Ray at the moment, visuals are good, but the general disc playing experience has been largely overlooked somehow. Especially in the face of modern content browsing experiences. Don't know why it went this particular way.
The exceeding point of all of this is not a war on resolution, but when is enough enough for each individual consumer. There's going to be a different answer for a lot of people, especially once we get beyond 8K in home, but 4K and 8K are pretty clearly the trend moving forward for in home and *god I hope we do it right and more often in cinema* 8K.
Resolution is not the end all and be all, but it is part of the recipe that leads to a quality viewing experience.
Around 3rd/4th quarter of this year when the 8K displays hit places you can actually buy them you'll be able to do a nice little eye test between two 85" inch models hopefully side by side of 4K and 8K. I just got to do this the first time in January in anything close to the same size screen, so I have my answer. I also oddly have my answer in a 30" screen.
As of right now there's value to DCI screens in as small as a 15.3" diagonal display (13.9" for UHD 8K) - approximate btw, but initially we'll be seeing the big screens to showcase UHD 8K as they show it rather dramatically well.
If we're talking cinema level viewing experience the bitrates to support that DCI level bitrate we need to hit that 31.25MB/s DCI 4K 12-bit spec. We're just getting there shortly with premium internet to deliver anything like that with overprovisioning.
That said, the UHD 4K (and even 8K) that Netflix, Amazon, and YouTube provide is not terrible. In fact that's the best streaming high resolution content the masses have access to at the moment. But that of course requires hardware and an internet connection to support the bandwidth. Oddly I'm sadly unimpressed by some aspects of UHD Blu-Ray at the moment, visuals are good, but the general disc playing experience has been largely overlooked somehow. Especially in the face of modern content browsing experiences. Don't know why it went this particular way.
The exceeding point of all of this is not a war on resolution, but when is enough enough for each individual consumer. There's going to be a different answer for a lot of people, especially once we get beyond 8K in home, but 4K and 8K are pretty clearly the trend moving forward for in home and *god I hope we do it right and more often in cinema* 8K.
Resolution is not the end all and be all, but it is part of the recipe that leads to a quality viewing experience.
Around 3rd/4th quarter of this year when the 8K displays hit places you can actually buy them you'll be able to do a nice little eye test between two 85" inch models hopefully side by side of 4K and 8K. I just got to do this the first time in January in anything close to the same size screen, so I have my answer. I also oddly have my answer in a 30" screen.
As of right now there's value to DCI screens in as small as a 15.3" diagonal display (13.9" for UHD 8K) - approximate btw, but initially we'll be seeing the big screens to showcase UHD 8K as they show it rather dramatically well.