- Thread starter
- #361
Tom Lowe
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 8,520
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
USlatin, for the Vegas shot, I was shooting high ISO and wide iris (F4, I think) in order to get fast exposure times for a 1000-frame timelapse film. If that was a single shot, I would have stopped down to gain DOF and probably backed off the ISO a lot. Usually for star shots, you can't see much movement in the star unless you go over 30s. So, instead of 6s exposures, I could have stopped way down to F11, or backed the ISO to 400 and let the exposure run to 20s. Then again, there was a lot of wind that night, and I was worried about the wood grain on the tree blurring.
In terms of compositing, you might be able to comp a timelapse sky to a landscape, but that would be "cheating," IMO, and not something I would do, unless it was very obviously an effect. I like to be able to tell people that everything is "straight out of the camera, with no FX." Once you start with FX, it's a slippery slope, and you lose some of your "purity." This is one of the reasons Terrence Malick, for example, does not like to use artificial light for his movies.
That is not say I am against compositing for special shots, like maybe adding a singer to a timelapse background plate for a music video or something. Just for pure landscape and outdoor work, I would rather keep everything as "pure" as possible, so to speak. :wink:
But then again, even Malick allowed some sky compositing in The Thin Red Line when it served the story. That shot of Nick Nolte talking about the "Rosie Fingered Dawn" has a comped sky.
In terms of compositing, you might be able to comp a timelapse sky to a landscape, but that would be "cheating," IMO, and not something I would do, unless it was very obviously an effect. I like to be able to tell people that everything is "straight out of the camera, with no FX." Once you start with FX, it's a slippery slope, and you lose some of your "purity." This is one of the reasons Terrence Malick, for example, does not like to use artificial light for his movies.
That is not say I am against compositing for special shots, like maybe adding a singer to a timelapse background plate for a music video or something. Just for pure landscape and outdoor work, I would rather keep everything as "pure" as possible, so to speak. :wink:
But then again, even Malick allowed some sky compositing in The Thin Red Line when it served the story. That shot of Nick Nolte talking about the "Rosie Fingered Dawn" has a comped sky.




