- Banned
- #201
Video/motion isn't very interesting to me, and I had never heard of Red before the DSMC "DSLR killer" comment. Is any of this hype, and the announcement on Thursday, about that device, or is all of this just about Scarlet and Epic and other video products?
1. Scaret and Epic are NOT video products; they are digital cinema projects, which is far better than video.
2. Since RED seems disinterested in optical viewfinders, I for one am highly skeptical of the DSMC and other RED products for serious still photography; keep an eye on it in case they fix this, but otherwise you might want to stick with Canon or Nikon.
3. I think all of this so-called "hype" is only directly related to Scarlet/Epic (DSMC equivalent is supposed to be in January if I'm not mistaken?) However, RED is likely to apply some/most of what was learned in the construction of these cameras to whatever they end up doing with DSMC, so there is likely to be some connection -- though what that connection is will probably not be evident until the DSMC announcements.
4. Stills pulled from RED motion footage are generally of much better quality than stills pulled from video footage; some are supposedly using the One as a high-speed-continuous still camera at times by pulling the frames they are most interested in; the One is a 12 Mpix camera). This does not, however, fix the EVF problem, so monitoring is still limited when considering use for serious still photography.
Note: if EVF doesn't bother you, feel free to disregard #2 and the "This does not" segment of #4... it bothers me though, and I have no intention of considering DSMC (or any other product from RED or any other company) as a primary camera for still photo work if it lacks an optical viewfinder.
I'm DEFINITELY waiting excitedly for info about Scarlet. One is too far out of my price range right now, so Epic certainly will be as well for the forseeable future.
Jim, planning any giveaway contests, like Canon's photo-in-the-parks one, for example?