Luis Otero
Well-known member
Peter/Rohit,
I am processing a footage for a DCP authoring, and I normally use a transforming LUT to generate DCI P3/7 compliant material, so I can by-pass the DCP software auto conversion. I just did a test, and exported 3 three minutes of the material using the Resolve TIFF 16 bit XYZ option, and also using the TIFF 16 bit RGB with the LUT burned in; then I encoded two mini DCPs. I was pleasantly surprised to see that I got exactly the same results when compared both images.
Based on these results, can I assume that the TIFF 16 bit XYZ option is doing the appropriate translation that my test is suggesting? If so, this is great! The encoding goes faster when I do not use the auto-conversion (RGB to X'Y'Z').
Please confirm,
BTW, I am using the QuVIS player for Mac to do the verification, and it is really a sweet cheap piece of software!
I am processing a footage for a DCP authoring, and I normally use a transforming LUT to generate DCI P3/7 compliant material, so I can by-pass the DCP software auto conversion. I just did a test, and exported 3 three minutes of the material using the Resolve TIFF 16 bit XYZ option, and also using the TIFF 16 bit RGB with the LUT burned in; then I encoded two mini DCPs. I was pleasantly surprised to see that I got exactly the same results when compared both images.
Based on these results, can I assume that the TIFF 16 bit XYZ option is doing the appropriate translation that my test is suggesting? If so, this is great! The encoding goes faster when I do not use the auto-conversion (RGB to X'Y'Z').
Please confirm,
BTW, I am using the QuVIS player for Mac to do the verification, and it is really a sweet cheap piece of software!