Peter Matthes
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2009
- Messages
- 1,071
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 56
- Location
- New York City
- Website
- www.penandincfilms.com
Jim, Jarred and the Red Team.
In this post (below), Ketch was most likely semi-joking.
http://reduser.net/forum/showpost.php?p=608850&postcount=74
However ... if it is feasible ... I believe that being able to christen (printed by Red) your Epic / Scarlet would be a great idea for a couple reasons.
Since the beginning of Red's camera program, owners have being unofficially naming their Red One cameras. This was reflective of the strong connection that owner / operators felt towards their new photographic tool. There is little doubt that this strong affinity between camera and owner will continue as Red transitions into the Epic Scarlet line. :001_wub:
I am quite sure that many customers would pay the extra cash for Red to properly and permanently print the name of their camera on the rear end of the brain. :thumbsup:
Several future Epic owners (Ketch, myself, etc.) and future Scarlet owners (Joseph Hutson) have already expressed a potential interest in doing this. Most likely, because we plan on owning this camera for a long time to come.
I might even go so far as to suggest that each name should only be used once, and listed in a formal database. If each Epic / Scarlet camera had its own individual and visible name, it would be significantly harder for stolen cameras to be utilized undetected. :violent5:
If you think about it, boats and cars have benefited from this type of vanity label (identification) for decades.
I would love to hear if others agree ... or disagree.
In this post (below), Ketch was most likely semi-joking.
http://reduser.net/forum/showpost.php?p=608850&postcount=74
However ... if it is feasible ... I believe that being able to christen (printed by Red) your Epic / Scarlet would be a great idea for a couple reasons.
Since the beginning of Red's camera program, owners have being unofficially naming their Red One cameras. This was reflective of the strong connection that owner / operators felt towards their new photographic tool. There is little doubt that this strong affinity between camera and owner will continue as Red transitions into the Epic Scarlet line. :001_wub:
I am quite sure that many customers would pay the extra cash for Red to properly and permanently print the name of their camera on the rear end of the brain. :thumbsup:
Several future Epic owners (Ketch, myself, etc.) and future Scarlet owners (Joseph Hutson) have already expressed a potential interest in doing this. Most likely, because we plan on owning this camera for a long time to come.
I might even go so far as to suggest that each name should only be used once, and listed in a formal database. If each Epic / Scarlet camera had its own individual and visible name, it would be significantly harder for stolen cameras to be utilized undetected. :violent5:
If you think about it, boats and cars have benefited from this type of vanity label (identification) for decades.
I would love to hear if others agree ... or disagree.