Elsie N
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 6,658
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I never said that even a student shouldn't be able to shoot on an Epic, I just stated that you have to weigh in your expectations for its value. If you have no way to earn that investment back when you purchased it, then perhaps you need to consider that at the time of purchase and have NO expectations to have it pay for itself. That's why I called it a loss-leader. You are buying it with the expectancy of a non-recouped loss. That's fine. But to buy something and then whine about its value or how the upgrade path is bullshit, but only from the perspective of someone who never earned the investment back is one-sided.
I come from a working cinematographer's stand point. Even wildlife, documentary and still photographers are earning some value out of the investment if they are using it on paid jobs, regardless if they charge a formal "rental" fee or not.
I think my thinking is just fine, thanks.
As long as you agree that everyone is entitled to own and shoot RED cameras, that they are not just for a certain segment, then I agree your thinking is just fine. '-)