John Brawley
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 619
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- www.johnbrawley.com
not only that, they are passing it around to other companies for different aspects of the project. one company is doing the edit, another is doing color, another is doing graphics, another is doing vfx, and there is a post producer that is working with all his clients to get it done. like i said once before, it took 3 days to get 3.2k approved to shoot one shot.
yes, all people i know with 8k cameras doing productions, basically do it on their own or with their own little company, all in one shop.
though network tv shows dont work that way.
Yep, I’ll mirror this as well.
In the US (and Australia) unless it’s for a certain set of streamers then no broadcaster is interested in 4K origination or even RAW. IN fact even the Netflix mythology doens’t so much hold up. They stream plenty of content shot Alexa, it’s only their own “Netflix Original” brand of content that has the 4K+ requirement. Stuff they actually commission themselves (which they’re tending to do more and more of in the face of other competition)
Otherwise it’s overwhelmingly 1920 ProRes for both acquisition and delivery. I’m not sure anyone who’s not inside that market understands how truly complex it becomes when dealing with the turnaround, amount of dailies, working in different cities with many different vendors.
ProRes isn’t ideal by a long shot, but it’s what the defacto standard is.
I was at first excited about ProRes RAW, but the more I look at it, the less I understand it.
JB