Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Minimum data rates, field storage

Martin Saxer

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I am thinking about Scarlet and a budget for an upcoming documentary project in early 2010, partly shot in remote locations. The big uncertainty for me right now is how to store the enormous amounts of data on the road. The Scarlet specs only feature the maximum data rates these little machines will be able to process. Has there been any hint at the possibly lowest data rates? Scarlet S35 is now rated REDCODE 80, but I guess this is for 5K 30fs.
- Any guestimates what minimum data rates QuadHD or FF1080p @ 24fps could be?
- I am also thinking about other options for those remote location shots, like using Convergent Design's Flash XDR (fed from the HD-SDI signal) as an interim solution until suitable field storage options are available. Anything (apart from loosing Redcode) that would speak against this?
 
Why don't you just bring a powerful laptop (I'd say like a Macbook Pro) and get maybe 2 1 TB external HDDs. Use one for storage and the other for backup.

I assume the lowest data rate will be Redcode 28, since this is the lowest the Red One has.
 
Back
Top