Steven Hilder
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 80
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
While the image is beautifully noise-free, I can't help noticing significant debayer artifacts:
[crop from top-left corner attached, shown at 200%, exaggerated (a lot) with contrast]
This doesn't really bother me, as I intend to resample in post down to 2K or HD, but I'd be interested in hearing RED's comments on this - was this just a 'quick & dirty' debayer?
Also, at 5220x2740, this shot appears to show the entire S35 chip area, including the masked 64x16 frame (which I understand is for calibrating black levels?). This leaves a 5092x2708 active image area - slightly less than the 5120-pixel width that many people expected, and with no room for any horizonal look-around at 5K 2:1.
I posted similar comments in Jim's Recon thread about image circles; I'm looking forward to seeing the full official details on available resolutions, sensor sizes and look-around options. The term "5K" doesn't really tell the whole story.
[crop from top-left corner attached, shown at 200%, exaggerated (a lot) with contrast]
This doesn't really bother me, as I intend to resample in post down to 2K or HD, but I'd be interested in hearing RED's comments on this - was this just a 'quick & dirty' debayer?
Also, at 5220x2740, this shot appears to show the entire S35 chip area, including the masked 64x16 frame (which I understand is for calibrating black levels?). This leaves a 5092x2708 active image area - slightly less than the 5120-pixel width that many people expected, and with no room for any horizonal look-around at 5K 2:1.
I posted similar comments in Jim's Recon thread about image circles; I'm looking forward to seeing the full official details on available resolutions, sensor sizes and look-around options. The term "5K" doesn't really tell the whole story.