Nikhil Kamkolkar
Well-known member
A bit like Kubrick's shaky long-lens Steadicam shot in the assault on the sniper's building. Totally inappropriate use of Steadicam!
"Let's get it done!!!" shot by John Ward. http://www.steadishots.org/shots_detail.cfm?shotID=277
I think a lot more can go into it than just the choice of a tool. http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2007/08/17/unsteadicam-chronicles/
If I remember the commentary/interviews on the Bourne Supremacy (or Ultimatum) correctly, Greengrass also used a steadicam but with an intent to be shaky/cutty for several scenes. And he had to worry about the steadicam operator's concern for his career and reputation...
Also a reason I liked Ninja 2 for the fight scenes. No camouflaging via edits/motion in that movie!
Anyways, people are always trying to find new visual grammar, and I will not be surprised once these gimbals get past their initial delivery mandate of steady moving shots, if they are put to different uses. With profiles, motors, and some intelligence included, they can be and will be capable of more. Imagine a gimbal that adds a specific shake to every shot based on a profile...
Shake baby shake ...



