William Albertini
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 367
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- New York, NY
- Website
- www.billalbertini.com
Kodak still has a deep portfolio of patents, including those for cmos sensors......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I wonder if Jim might be able to snap Kodak up for a song, if he times it right? Then again, he'd have to calculate what the "Kodak" name and patents are even worth any more. Certainly, there might be some kind of "circle of life" elegance to Jim acquiring Kodak.
In my opinion, the way Kodak has been mis-managed over the last decade borders on criminal negligence. A sad state of affairs for a legendary company.
You can always short ARRI today.
I'm not so sure about this: maybe because Germany has lowest unemployment in 20 years while, pretty much, the rest of Europe the highest in history...:wink5:You can always short ARRI today.
Current market value is a mere $126 million. Affordable. Only problem is it is burning cash. Acquiring it would be a quick way for RED to go public. Like you said, though, one would have to know what value there is in the patents and IP, along with the value of the brand. :confused1:
Problem is all the retiree benefits ... and that horrible run rate ... i think it will have to go belly up first ...It would be crazy if it turned out that some big Jim Jannard or Gordon Gecko type figure was smart enough to short Kodak all the way to 25 cents a share, then use the short proceeds to scoop the company up for a song and turn it around.
Problem is all the retiree benefits ... and that horrible run rate ... i think it will have to go belly up first ...
I'm amazed that people still hold Kodak stock. Must be die-hard supporters, employees and officers with stock option plans and the few who couldn't see the forest for the trees and now just figured they will ride it out. I'm betting Kodak will be acquired by another camera or technology company looking to absorb their patents and other IP.
I wonder if Jim might be able to snap Kodak up for a song, if he times it right? Then again, he'd have to calculate what the "Kodak" name and patents are even worth any more. Certainly, there might be some kind of "circle of life" elegance to Jim acquiring Kodak.
In my opinion, the way Kodak has been mis-managed over the last decade borders on criminal negligence. A sad state of affairs for a legendary company.
I wish I would have shorted this stock a couple years ago. I would be filthy rich right now. Only trouble is, I did not have the cash to do it.
A few years ago you could have legally shorted the stock, it did not cost anything to short, the cost could be closing the transaction in a volitile stock- Going long costs money!
I guess the buyer would need to wait until bankruptcy proceedings had officially begun? It would not be possible to buy the company, then bring it through bankruptcy, would it? By the way, I am not suggesting to screw the retirees and pensioners.
Sorry but I believe there has always been a margin requirement when shorting stock. Shorting stock requires that you "borrow" the shares you are selling short and for that, you have to put up margin.