Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

ISO Pics analyized

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not a test. Period..no control..not actual output from camera..downrezzed photos. Now if you have the correct information then perhaps.
 
As it becomes clear that RED is real and what's more 'rocks', a lot of web sites will be using any excuse to post RED related news. RED is the new SEX. It sells baby and we are going to have to get used to it.

In many ways I'm a little sad that the journey is nearly over. Soon RED will be mainstream and everyone will know all about it; its no longer the sacred secret of the enlightened few.

But then again, I'll get to make my short with it next year!
 
joelnet said:
I think Peter Jackson and Soderbergh have a little more influence than whoevertheyare.com
Click to expand...

he hee... possibly.:nerd:

I just wonder WHY someone makes a ton of detailed analysis based on a heavily compressed picture, wrong color space, from a Beta camera...

...and publishes it...
 
Antoine Fabi said:
he hee... possibly.:nerd:

I just wonder WHY someone makes a ton of detailed analysis based on a heavily compressed picture, wrong color space, from a Beta camera...

...and publishes it...
Click to expand...

Maybe for the same reason that people join as Junior Members and post threads with provocative titles like, "Red Team beat up students for wearing Sony badges."

Read the wiki quote on disinformation. It's quite informative, but leaves out one of the key disinformation techniques, which is; 'Tell a lot of rational truth, with just enough false information to cause doubt'. Every time I see these murky posts and "articles" about Red, it leaps out at me as classic disinformation. Not that I'm accusing anybody directly, of course. It could just be incompetent misinformation, but that's almost as bad.

Much as I'll miss the images, I think Jim's justified in freezing things for now.
 
RED_Image_Quality.gif
 
I always thought gremlins were to blame.
 
Here we go again - with another REDiculous study with incomplete information from im.thatoneguy with "Red image Quality as a function of Magical Creature Proximity"

Where the heck are the Aliens and Big Foot? Reds 'AU' Awesome Units and 4k resolution with low noise in low light would surely capture these creatures and prove their very existence - unlike film of Big Foot and Alien Autopsy that was blurry, grainy, and hard to see that they were real... now, we can prove the so called expert scientists all wrong!

They exist! RED will capture and prove IT. Hale to the MAD SCIENTIST!

Now, excuse me, I have to take my medication now - the pink elephants are circling me. :-)
 
Oh. Boy. Just remember the old saying:
"One fancy thermometer does not a doctor make"

I have a really hard time to grasp what the article tries to prove, or dispute. But I'm actually more stunned that they haven't pulled it yet, as it clearly serves no purpose and shows utter incompetence in both it's intended goal and procedures.

Well, guess it's another low blow for the so called internet reviewers/experts....
 
I can answer all of your questions.

What is the article trying to prove: Studies look more important with lots of charts.

Why hasn't it been pulled: Had you heard of CCI before this post? Didn't think so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top