ISO, ISO...

[Alex Boothby]

By my calculations, the Animal Crackers box is being hit with one foot candle. ;-)

Nick

Classsic

 

[Andrew Wilding]

amazing. A single candle at t2.8. Unreal!

 

[Robert Berger]

giv it to me

giv it to me

Here is one lit by my iPhone... a free app called "Just Light". Not very bright. Daylight balanced and still about ISO 4000.

Download the app yourself, turn off all the lights and see what I'm talking about...

Jim

In the reflection on the left, i can read your email.....LOL

Robert M. Berger NSC
Red One 1265 until Epic comes

 

[Pawel Achtel]

After I go out and buy all new 5600K lights you spring this . Very impressive.

I thought all lights above 4200k can be purchased with a cool-off period. :biggrinjester:

This is insane. Jim, if the boys can achieve this clean image on a 30-second exposure there is no way you can weasel out of an Oscar or two.

With your next test, can you point the camera WFO into the moonless sky (on 16 January 2010)?

 

[Tom Lowe]

Still running company business out of your garage, eh Jim? :thumbsup:

This low-light stuff is impressing the hell out of me. I knew you guys would be pushing hard on this, but you are really pushing it now. It's great to see.

 

[Ikemedia]

Truly epic Jim.

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

Thanks Jim

This is absolutely fantastic low light performance shots on R1 with M-X sensor at ISO 4000 using zoom lens wide open @ T2.8.

 

[Jannard]

Again... we aren't done. Here is a bit larger size. ISO 4000.

Jim

 

[Deanan]

This is insane. Jim, if the boys can achieve this clean image on a 30-second exposure there is no way you can weasel out of an Oscar or two.

30 sec exposure?

 

[Andrew Benz]

Neat... Let me try.

 

[Mark L. Pederson]

Not only is this totally amazing and exciting ... don't you think it's great that Jim is still working out of his garage.

 

[Pawel Achtel]

30 sec exposure?

Time lapse.

How come you still have the time to browse Reduser, Deanan? :biggrin5:

 

[paulherrin]

where'd you get the idea of a 30 second exposure or about timelapse?

i'm pretty sure we're looking at stills from an .r3d (without post noise reduction)

which, as it happens, is awesome. next time i'm short on lights i'll just round up the crew's cells.

 

[Deanan]

Time lapse.

How come you still have the time to browse Reduser, Deanan? :biggrin5:

Epic and Scarlet will be killer timelapse machines.

I used to do some crazy timelapse boxes about 10 years ago and I'm super
excited about what we'll be able to do in the new cameras.

 

[Andrew Wilding]

I think Pawel was saying that if this is the same level as noise that can be expected from a 30 second exposure at 4000iso, he is in heaven.

 

[Pawel Achtel]

where'd you get the idea of a 30 second exposure or about timelapse?

That's what I do and the only reason I use Canon DSLRs is because they produce the cleanest high ISO image on long exposures. From what Jim showed here, it looks like this may change.

 

[Deanan]

where'd you get the idea of a 30 second exposure or about timelapse?

i'm pretty sure we're looking at stills from an .r3d (without post noise reduction)

I'm pretty sure Jim's shooting at 1/48sec.

 

[Pawel Achtel]

Epic and Scarlet will be killer timelapse machines.

I used to do some crazy timelapse boxes about 10 years ago and I'm super
excited about what we'll be able to do in the new cameras.

Music to my ears, Deanan. :biggrin5:

 

[paulherrin]

That's what I do and the only reason I use Canon DSLRs is because they produce the cleanest high ISO image on long exposures. From what Jim showed here, it looks like this may change.

oh, well yeah... but i think we were finished talking about dslr's a long time ago - or maybe it just didn't need to come up.

i'd like to see a 30 second exposure on the new sensors... wow!

yeah, i've shot 30 second exposures on my humble canon dslr at ISO 1600 and I wish they looked this good, I really do. the newer ones do a little better than mine... yet still - golly gee whillicker.

 

[Tonaci Tran]

AMAZING JIM!!!!