kay madsen
Well-known member
nitpicking...? Well if you do advertising for a product which definitely voids the warranty of the camera it was produced for – and not telling that right way also on your website it´s just not a good stile at all. Period.
This is just an example of a scewed up way, companies think they can get a way with it, without really solving a problem and communicating.
If you call all this marketing, It is defiantly poor marketing…
Marketing has nothing to do with good style. No company would warn a potential customer of the risks involved in using his product unless forced to do so. Let´s enjoy one more time what the late comedic genius Bill Hicks had to say about marketing...
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=gDW_Hj2K0wo
P&S developed the first IMS mount for the RED camera where the whole camera front had to be taken off. RED told them that taking of the front of the camera voids your guarrantee. P&S then developed a new version where you don´t have to take off the camera front and thought they solved the problem. They rushed ahead and prematurely put that info on their website without communicating with RED and having the mount approved. Bad mistake. Now RED has put them at the end of the line and they are sitting on their mount hoping somebody at RED will take his time and test the mount. I give P&S credit for telling people that want to buy the mount on the phone that it voids your guarantee. That is good style for shure, better than what most companies would do.
The people who suffer most from this whole situation are the potential buyers. I have a set of Nikons lenses at home aswell as a few Zeiss PL mounted lenses and thought about buying some cool old BNCR mounted rehoused cooke lenses. That´s only possible with the IMS mount... if I seem biased towards P&S it´s only out of selfish reasons. I want this mount badly... and everybody who accuses P&S of whatever is only helping to reduce my chances to get the mount as soon as possible (or maybe not, because in the end as you said BURGER all the discussions seemed to have gotten things moving again...)