David Rasberry
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,266
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I believe the brains have basic audio I/O support via unbalanced stereo mini-jacks like many prosumer cameras. This has not been confirmed however.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So then it looks like for sound you would need the "Pro Cinema I/O Module".
Very true, and even if all Scarlet 2/3" did was offer images equal to an F900 and frame rates twice that of a Varicam ...
let alone with the pricing and other advanced feature advantages.... you would still expect it to be a major hit.
Scarlet 2/3" use the Mysterium-X.
Scarlet 2/3" is 3K.
So, I expect Scarlet 2/3" offer the better images quality than F900.
Should I?
This still requires a data pipeline and sensor/A/D processor speeds good enough to handle the data rates required, even if storage is off camera. Notice that none of the big players have signed on to the standard.
Will this stop the big guys? I don't think so. Is Red the only one capable of producing this technology that allows the handling of motion picture RAW? I don't think so. Don't be too surprised when the RAW wars begin, you can bet they are coming.
Will this stop the big guys? I don't think so. Is Red the only one capable of producing this technology that allows the handling of motion picture RAW? I don't think so. Don't be too surprised when the RAW wars begin, you can bet they are coming.
No question they can do it. The question is at what price and in what time frame? At the rate Canon is improving based on existing camera raw frame rates they are two years or more away from RAW 24p at something like XL or XH price with APSC sensor. I think Panny may beat them all with 4/3 format RAW.
Canon seems to have the least to cannibalize at the high end -- which is to say, it has no high end to speak of. Canon is supposed to make a major product announcement at the end of this month. Red has the apparent advantage because it has a proven track record with Red One and is only a few months from releasing new products. Who knows whether Canon has been secretly developing the sensor technology to compete head-on with Red. Where Canon obviously has the know-how is lens technology. If it were to unveil an APS-C-format video camera system, complete with a set of high-quality, fast, inexpensive video/film lenses (including an 8x or 10x constant-aperture zoom), as well as an 18-MP global-shutter sensor and a high-quality "RAW" codec (e.g., a 5-6K version of Cineform RAW), it might have something. If Canon prices such a camera body like the XL H1, it may be handing Red a victory. If it's closer to the XH's price, then Canon stands to clean up.No question they can do it. The question is at what price and in what time frame? At the rate Canon is improving based on existing camera raw frame rates they are two years or more away from RAW 24p at something like XL or XH price with APSC sensor. I think Panny may beat them all with 4/3 format RAW.
I used to visit this forum a year ago.
They announced the Scarlet and I was very excited because it was exactly the camera I wanted to buy.
I put all my projects on hold...
First they said that it will be available in spring 2009.
Then they said it will be available in summer. Then they pushed the date to autumn.....
Now it's autumn and there is no Scarlet to buy....
I eventually purchased a Panasonic camera and I will never buy from Red because they tricked me...
it's been explained that most of the delays are related to the economic issues the world has been going through,
"economic issues"
but even at 5k... I know of 25 if not more of my film buds that would throw 5k right now....