Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

How to shoot yourself in the foot (and kill the market too)

Kenneth C Merrill

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
506
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Los Angeles
I was trying to figure out a fair rate to rent my Scarlet MX for a few days. Ran across this:

uHOuUFzUfUdTnnuT


It's no wonder the market for Red cameras is tanking.
 
That's what I've been seeing too: usually a low of 450. I was floored when I found this. If you're having to rent your camera so cheaply, you probably shouldn't have that camera in the first place.
 
probably Los Angeles... I've had plenty of experiences of being undercut
 
Yep- I found 3 more from the same listing site for $200/day in Los Angeles.

After fees, $200/day comes down to $170 net.

So...a $50K camera package at $170 a day would pay off at around 294 days, which is probably more like 294 weekends - 5.65 years

If they are lucky enough to pull in 3-day week rentals every single week, then it is 98 weeks - 1.88 years

Traditionally, the barrier to entry into The RED rentals game has been low and owner-op "DPs" undercut each other and race to the bottom.

Where you separate yourself is by shooting the hell out of the camera, keeping your equipment in top shape, and offering support around the clock. That's worth something and you should price yourself accordingly.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-02-13 at 7.57.29 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2016-02-13 at 7.57.29 PM.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Screen Shot 2016-02-13 at 8.00.02 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2016-02-13 at 8.00.02 PM.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Screen Shot 2016-02-13 at 8.25.06 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2016-02-13 at 8.25.06 PM.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
guess you can have it fully insured and hope someone breaks it
 
No matter what your price, there's always someone that will under price you...
 
Yep- I found 3 more from the same listing site for $200/day in Los Angeles.

After fees, $200/day comes down to $170 net.

So...a $50K camera package at $170 a day would pay off at around 294 days, which is probably more like 294 weekends - 5.65 years

If they are lucky enough to pull in 3-day week rentals every single week, then it is 98 weeks - 1.88 years

Traditionally, the barrier to entry into The RED rentals game has been low and owner-op "DPs" undercut each other and race to the bottom.

Where you separate yourself is by shooting the hell out of the camera, keeping your equipment in top shape, and offering support around the clock. That's worth something and you should price yourself accordingly.

I'd imagine that many of these people renting the camera out are owner/operators that bought the camera mainly to shoot. Most likely they plan on paying it off by doing actual work. Anything extra is just icing on the cake. I've rented gear out for much lower prices than rental houses on days that i don't have a gig.
 
But if you rent higher, everybody can. There is no reason to race to the bottom on rentals. It just hurts the entire market because then producers see the Alexa as a high end camera, and the Red as the one they can get for $200 for a weekend for their smaller productions. Then all RED owners lose out. Whether you rent or use it as an owner op.
 
I'd imagine that many of these people renting the camera out are owner/operators that bought the camera mainly to shoot. Most likely they plan on paying it off by doing actual work. Anything extra is just icing on the cake. I've rented gear out for much lower prices than rental houses on days that i don't have a gig.

One man's icing is another man's leaving money on the table. It's ultimately up to you but I would hope that my peers would want to make each other more money in the long run by keeping rates at close to rental house rates. I bet you'd end up with about the same residual income by charging twice as much and renting half the time. Plus, higher rent clients would probably treat your camera better.

Either that, or give your camera away for free to your friends on days you aren't working.
 
But if you rent higher, everybody can. There is no reason to race to the bottom on rentals. It just hurts the entire market because then producers see the Alexa as a high end camera, and the Red as the one they can get for $200 for a weekend for their smaller productions. Then all RED owners lose out. Whether you rent or use it as an owner op.

Market forces are tough to combat. There are so many people that reached to buy an inexpensive Red camera and will rent it for very little to get some money back. Not that many people are doing that with Arri camera's.
 
WHen I put out ads in L.A. looking for a gaffer for a shoot I got responses for Red Dragon PLUS DP (director of photography) for $300/day
 
Back
Top