This is my first post on this forum. I am interested in low-cost interchangeable lens cameras for documentary work. Obviously the Scarlet promises to be ideal for this purpose, when it is released.
The question of a realistic release date for any camera is important so that a potential purchaser can plan for it - which lenses and accessories to buy, whether to buy a competitors camera, whether to commence a project in a certain format or to wait. Some people on this forum are seeking reliable information so that they can decide if they can wait for the release of the Scarlet. These purchasing decisions are of particular importance to independent film-makers who operate outside of the cashed-up cinema/broadcast/advertising world.
An announcement of a proposed release date is always part of the marketing strategy for technology products. The manufacturer hopes that potential buyers make a choice to wait for the new product.
The loyalty to Scarlet on this forum is remarkable for a product that is not even manufactured yet, but I get the feeling that it is not a balanced discussion. I noticed that some forum users who have commented on the overdue release of the Scarlet are now banned. One was called a "goat herder" (a more honest profession than most jobs in this business). Another forum user who asked about release dates was told by Jim to take his question to dvxuser.
Red has built a strategy of marketing forthcoming products by suggesting release dates (that have turned out for one reason or another to be unrealistic). Is it fair that posters who make critical comments about the delays, or who are simply seeking current information should be treated to such arrogance?
The question of a realistic release date for any camera is important so that a potential purchaser can plan for it - which lenses and accessories to buy, whether to buy a competitors camera, whether to commence a project in a certain format or to wait. Some people on this forum are seeking reliable information so that they can decide if they can wait for the release of the Scarlet. These purchasing decisions are of particular importance to independent film-makers who operate outside of the cashed-up cinema/broadcast/advertising world.
An announcement of a proposed release date is always part of the marketing strategy for technology products. The manufacturer hopes that potential buyers make a choice to wait for the new product.
The loyalty to Scarlet on this forum is remarkable for a product that is not even manufactured yet, but I get the feeling that it is not a balanced discussion. I noticed that some forum users who have commented on the overdue release of the Scarlet are now banned. One was called a "goat herder" (a more honest profession than most jobs in this business). Another forum user who asked about release dates was told by Jim to take his question to dvxuser.
Red has built a strategy of marketing forthcoming products by suggesting release dates (that have turned out for one reason or another to be unrealistic). Is it fair that posters who make critical comments about the delays, or who are simply seeking current information should be treated to such arrogance?
Last edited: