Stephen Pruitt
Well-known member
Hi all. . .
I'm in a bit of quandry. Currently have a pretty nice set of Nikon-mount lenses for my RED (I'm using the new DX Underdahl mount):
Nikon 10.5mm f2.8 fisheye DX
Tokina 11-16mm zoom f2.8 DX
Nikon 17-35mm zoom AFS f2.8
Nikon 50mm AIS f1.4
Nikon 28-70mm AFS f2.8
Nikon 85mm AIS f1.4
Nikon 105mm AF DC f2.0
Nikon 135mm AIS f2.0
Nikon 180mm AIS f2.8
I was toying with the idea of buying the Nikon 300mm f2.8 AIS super telephoto lens to "complete" my package. It will probably run between $1200 and $1300 in good shape. But that's a REALLY long lens on the RED, equivalent to about a 450mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Having NEVER even used a lens that long, I wonder if it is such a specialty item that no one would likely ever use it or if it is such a killer lens optically that it would definitely find a place in the bag. I'm a sucker for rich boken, and I hear that that lens renders an extraordinary bokeh on the out-of-focus portions of the image.
Anyway, does anyone have any thoughts about this lens on the RED?
Would a 1.4x or 2.0x teleconverter make sense instead?
Thanks much.
Stephen
I'm in a bit of quandry. Currently have a pretty nice set of Nikon-mount lenses for my RED (I'm using the new DX Underdahl mount):
Nikon 10.5mm f2.8 fisheye DX
Tokina 11-16mm zoom f2.8 DX
Nikon 17-35mm zoom AFS f2.8
Nikon 50mm AIS f1.4
Nikon 28-70mm AFS f2.8
Nikon 85mm AIS f1.4
Nikon 105mm AF DC f2.0
Nikon 135mm AIS f2.0
Nikon 180mm AIS f2.8
I was toying with the idea of buying the Nikon 300mm f2.8 AIS super telephoto lens to "complete" my package. It will probably run between $1200 and $1300 in good shape. But that's a REALLY long lens on the RED, equivalent to about a 450mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Having NEVER even used a lens that long, I wonder if it is such a specialty item that no one would likely ever use it or if it is such a killer lens optically that it would definitely find a place in the bag. I'm a sucker for rich boken, and I hear that that lens renders an extraordinary bokeh on the out-of-focus portions of the image.
Anyway, does anyone have any thoughts about this lens on the RED?
Would a 1.4x or 2.0x teleconverter make sense instead?
Thanks much.
Stephen