Eryc Tramonn
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 795
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
The problem is that, until very recently, the Red universe has been changing so rapidly that a book would be badly out of date by the time it was published.
Completely with you, Shawn. But, as even you suggest in your statement, the operating procedurals are becoming more dialed in. At this stage, if the guide were a work in progress, that would make the task of compiling one a much less daunting proposition.
In the end, it's not that I disagree with you guys, but the fact is, I've been in situations where it would have been handy. I'm simply saying I would like to be able to dispel misinformation and conjecture surrounding the camera with a verifiable source, as well as have a reference for operating parameters, definitions, et al. Obviously, the DIT on our last shoot could have benefitted from one also...and again, the promotional campaign we were shooting was being executed by the internal production arm of a major network. So what I'm saying is, "once the techs have made up their minds on something, their comments and attitudes can negatively impact the agency reps." In this case, it's hard to go back fighting to use the camera on the next gig after all the stuff that was bandied about the last time around.
We've discussed compiling a manual in the past, but it remains a point of contention because no one seems to have offered a solution. Whatever though, the camera wasn't necessarily generated to supply for that market anyway. Honestly, I don't care about saving the agency money, they can remain as wanton in their approach as always...and the more money circulating in the economy, the better.