Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Free Energy Mylow Magnet Motor

Probably going to have to wait more than 20 years for his theories to be accepted... considering they don't actually accurately model the universe.

There's a reason he's being ignored... and it's not because his idea is so well followed.

By the way... the scientific community is also stubornly ignoring the Gavin-Greenwalt-Theory-That-Proves-Everything-Theory. Just need to wait for all those stuborn scientists and scientific journal editors to die out so that it finally gets the recognition it deserves!

Unless by dustup you mean there's a guy rolling around in the dust fighting windmills while the rest of the scientific community continues actually pursueing theories which haven't been disproven.
 
I was going to stop posting because of things here to do, but ironically I just turned on the computer and TV and the show "Lie to Me" was on, where a lying serial rapist gives away a detail that leads them to possible copycat called "Mylow".


Gavin Greenwalt said:
Probably going to have to wait more than 20 years for his theories to be accepted... considering they don't actually accurately model the universe.

There's a reason he's being ignored... and it's not because his idea is so well followed.

By the way... the scientific community is also stubbornly ignoring the Gavin-Greenwalt-Theory-That-Proves-Everything-Theory. Just need to wait for all those stubborn scientists and scientific journal editors to die out so that it finally gets the recognition it deserves!

Unless by dustup you mean there's a guy rolling around in the dust fighting windmills while the rest of the scientific community continues actually pursueing theories which haven't been disproven.
Click to expand...

It is also said some (invalid) theories only die out when their originators do. Unfortunately maths gives a level of complexity that gives wriggle room to obscure and hide from the truth. People with mistaken theories can keep them going while the rest of scientific community pass on, but unfortunately this can also mean that valid theories can also be ignored by the community until their originators die.

This turmoil is too common in the scientific world, far from logical, they are still merely not so objective humans with their own preferences. I personally wrote to one publication in times past about the desegregation of their reporting on an issue, I imagine a lot of people did, and it worked.

Jeff Kilgroe said:
Exactly. And why is it that only rural townsfolk from the southern USA seem to be the ones predominantly abducted by aliens?
Click to expand...

Or, maybe it is because New York black ops dropped in and convinced the aliens to go there instead. ;) . (ok, just had to say that one).

Are there aliens, that is an interesting one, what type of aliens, what is an alien. If my parents went to the US and I was born and bread there, and I snuck over here, I would maybe be an illegal alien. Then there apparently are aliens dropping in on us all the time according to the scientific community, microbes. But think about it, why would aliens be like us, unless they had common ancestry or make. But structural designs produce limitations, like the size of birds for a design, preference for legs and arms for very mobile dexterous land animals. But back to the argument, apart from common ancestry and make, i would not expect them to look human, even if they had arms and legs (but maybe that is the only sort that gets here) and maybe completely different basis.

The scientific community uses the convenient answer (skeptics love convenient answers) that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, therefore they could not possibly come here. The odds of life working at all are also a past subject. But if a theoretical alien can live for ten thousand or ten million years, or exists in space, it could still get here stay see us die and go back home. But the speed of light being a limit thing is a bit subjective, does it preclude engineering other methods. But these are factors of our system, externally to our system does this apply?

Re-edit, only a theoretical argument, I am not saying I believe that aliens are traveling in space ships to here.
 
David Rasberry said:
www.atomicprecision.com

Pretty big dustup in the theoretical physics world been going on for about 5 years now. Dr. Evans has won the mathematical and experimental proofs arguments though. As with Einstein, it will probably be another ten to twenty years before the last of the academic holdouts for the standard model bite the dust. Who was it that said new ideas in academia aren't accepted through persuasion but because the people who hold the old ideas finally die off?
But when you have senior research physicists for companies like Siemens, or government agencies like DARPA and the US navy actively participating in developing engineering applications of a major new theoretical paradigm, its past the academic stage.
I have followed this story for about 3 years now, and the dirty politics and soap opera emotions surrounding this are as interesting as the science. Its quite amusing to see Nobel laureates and other major award winning scientists at the tops of their profession calling each other crackpots and pseudo scientists while quibbling over the derivations and values of known universal constants out to the 17th decimal place.
Click to expand...

Perhaps so... but when I read "...spacetime continuum as a source of primordial charge density that drives all energetic phenomena..." , a phrase which has trouble keeping a straight face, I start getting nervous that my dilthium crystals are going to break if I don't keep them in a sturdier box.

-Steve
 
What I need to see is an experiment, predicted by Evans' theory, that wouldn't make sense under classical physics. Can you direct me to such an experiment?

Graeme
 
If it actually works it consumes the magnets.
If it doesn't work it's just a hoax.

I hope everyone has learned their lesson.

Fishing line... that's even less concealed than my idea to hide a little motor up behind the bearings. If you're going to be an international sensation... at least have the class to invest some real money into it.
 
Fishline. Haha... Busted.

Actually, I was seriously expecting just an electromagnet under their little box/platform or a hidden motor, like Gavin was saying.
 
Wayne Morellini said:
he also told me that the reason the Earth was heating up (global warming) was because people were pumping the oil out of the ground that lubricates the Earth in it's orbit around the sun.
Click to expand...

LOL! Haven't heard that one before, that's sort of awesome in a totally stupid way.
 
Graeme Nattress said:
What I need to see is an experiment, predicted by Evans' theory, that wouldn't make sense under classical physics. Can you direct me to such an experiment?

Graeme
Click to expand...

http://www.aias.us/index.php?goto=s...tal_advantages_of_ECE_over_the_Standard_Model

The Faraday Disc Generator has also been successfully explained for the first
time using ECE theory. A Faraday disk generator can be used to demonstrate
spin connection resonance (see paper 107 of the ECE series, www.aias.us).
This paper was again experimentally led, in fact in response to a report of an
exploding Faraday disk generator - that is, a generator that was presumably over powering itself.

Spacetime is in fact a large reservoir of energy. The reservoir that creates
gravitation, which keeps us on the ground, is the Cartan curvature of
spacetime. Space Energy, or Energy from Spacetime, is energy derived from
the geometry of spacetime. In the ECE theory, the zero point energy comes
from the zero'th eigenvalue of the ECE Lemma with harmonic oscillator eigen
functions. Space energy is not free energy. ECE theory predicts that voltages can reach infinity through SCR. This is no different from the electromagnetic spectrum having no limit. SCR does not violate Noether's Theorem and it does not create energy from nothing.
The spin connection is essential to Cartan geometry and general relativity,
because it is the entity that introduces torsion and curvature into spacetime. In ECE theory it comes in to the definition of the electromagnetic potential and electromagnetic field. The way in which it enters the theory allows resonances,which are peaks or surges of electric power from spacetime. This happens while rigorously obeying the basic law of conservation of energy.
It is simply a high voltage caused by a particular type of oscillation (resonance) of a collection of charges by three or more external frequencies. Unfortunately, the frequencies necessary to achieve resonances in most materials are either far too high (X-Rays) or unknown. For example, SCR in principle would allow one to ionize diatomic oxygen (and make it glow green) but this would require the incident electromagnetic waves to be gamma- or x-rays. So, for many materials and applications, SCR is impractical. However, there is anecdotal evidence that Germanium semiconductors and mild steel can exhibit SCR-induced voltage surges for many frequency and amplitude combinations in the radio frequency range. This is spin connection resonance on a macroscopic level, compared to molecular processes.
There have been many claims of over unity devices but currently the only
experiment / device that has been widely replicated and that demonstrates SCR conclusively is Bedini's SG motor - although the voltage gains are not that great (see, for example papers 63, 87 94 in the ECE theory series on the AIAS website- www.aias.us).
In principle the rotor in this specific Bedini device could be substituted with a solid state circuit. Some AIAS members have replicated Bedini’s SG motor thereby meeting the basic experimental requirements of reproducibility and repeatability.It seems to provide evidence of SCR-induced voltage surges (as discussed inpaper 94 of the ECE series on the AIAS website, www.aias.us)
 
Seems to me like the theory hides behind the obscurity of professionals fully equipped to debunk his theory while simultaneously attempting to ignore the number of individuals who have found his proofs to be incorrect. Neither you nor I can really verify any claim. We're at the mercy of others' opinions. Considering he hasn't managed to convince anyone else of any consequence to pursue his theories is strike 1. If the people who can make an informed decision are uninterested then why should I? It's like the RED camera. Even if you knew nothing about cameras you would be able to tell they were on to something based on the professionals of various fields who were excited.

It's the perfect receipe for unobstructed obscurity. He can claim to have invented anything so long as the average reader is unable to verify or dispute his claims.

Just throw up enough obfuscation such that 'disproval' is difficult and then proclaim victory when nobody bothers to disprove your work (which in this case has been done in at least two instances.)

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
 
Yeah, but the Faraday disk is not a new phenonema previously unknown that was predicted by the theory, it's an old experiment with an alternative explanation - ECE v Lortenz law.

Was the exploding generator fish line powered also? :-)

Graeme
 
No one has found his proofs to be incorrect. There is one individual(Bruhn) who has posted criticisms of "errors" but he mixes metaphors so to speak. He changes definitions by inserting non-Cartan terms into the equations corrupting the results. I understand the math well enough to read the equations and see what is being corrupted.

Evans equations are textbook standard Cartan differential geometry and can be proved in any high level symbolic math computer program such as Maxima (free) Maple, or Mathematica. Indeed he posts the Maxima code on his site so people can try it for themselves.

I spent a year and a half working through Roger Penrose's book "The Road to Reality, a complete guide to the laws of the universe." He was Stephen Hawkings mathematician and covers the history of all major physical theories up to the end of the 20th century, including the development of the mathematics.
Compared to some of the mathematical contortions some of those theories throw up, Evans is the soul of elegant simplicity. This is not to say that there is anything really simple about the mathematics of modern theoretical physics. However Evans and his fellows have reduced the equations to standard engineering vector analysis formats that can be calculated by computer and verified against experimental data.

As to interest, Evans website gets more than 250,000 hits a month and more than 10,000 downloads of posted papers by him and others. He is currently being more widely studied by government researchers, industry, and major universities, more than all other university research sites and physics institutes combined. In view of that there is precious little criticism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top