Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Foundry Storm...

Jannard

Red Leader
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
8,248
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Has anyone not tried it? You need to.

Jim
 
It's not 64 bit at the moment, but a 64 bit version is in the works.
 
Dying to Jim, but some of us deviants need to wait for a PC version :-)
 
This is going to be a great App when it is done. Right now it is slow and renders my Quicktimes dark and out of sync.

I am really digging RCX with the Tangent Wave. The combo is killer.

-DD
 
Yup. I have tried it and it's looking real promising too! Not the best Rocket-enabled playback at the moment and I have still to see how batch exporting works but I really like how fast you can apply looks and check the real-time scopes.
 
I'm in the same boat. Tried beta v. 1 & 2 now and still have to many minor bugs for me to use it daily. Rocket gives me some difficulty on it as well as many other items to numerous to mention. That said, yes i see the potential of Storm and will be in line to buy and use it in my workflow. But having spent tireless years now with redcine and now rcx, i know it too well and there's not guessing there. I look forward to foundry smoothing out the bumps quickly so i can put the storm to work.
 
Dying to Jim, but some of us deviants need to wait for a PC version :-)

Set your deviant ways aside and get a mac, Rudi. :-)

(ps call me when u can, have some ideas on the 3D stuff.)
 
Tried it. Liked it. But still some things missing...just downloaded the new version, will try it soon...
 
You are going to see bug fixes and more features over the next few weeks.

I can tell you this - the realtime histograms + scopes with fact that you can white balance in the viewer while the rocket is outputting the image - is just awesome. The viewer and rocket output are always live at the same time.

You can review and re-white balance footage lightning fast.

Even if you do all your processing/transcoding in RCX - you REALLY should check out storm just for how fast you can review and check footage on set.

I will mention that in my last round of tests with theFCP XML - I have seen FCP mess up some XMLs (go figure) - so, if you are having issues with loading in an XML -open the XML in a text editor and make sure everything seems correct.

But yeah - so very cool to "reconnect media" back to R3Ds.
 
How are people finding the speed of interface interaction with / without Rocket? I feel as though I can't grade effectively, and certainly not quickly, because the visual feedback from the interface is too slow, even at lower qualities. Even simple things like waving the mouse pointer over an image to check RGB values give sluggish results.

Is this just me? Surely its not all rocket related?

Very promising application though, with the simple stuff like clip organisation and tagging dealt with from the outset :)
 
Jim,

Curious if anyone has tried IFX Software's 'Ant'... If you haven't you should! Despite running on Linux, at least you can download the OS and install it on either Mac or PC hardware.

When Storm was announced, I was a little surprised to see the hype, since I've been doing most everything it does with Ant for more than a year now (has it been two?). It's not as pretty as storm in the UI, but its equally less distracting.

For the record, I helped write R3D/RAW support for Ant, but am otherwise not affiliated with them. If I could just finally see that damned Linux Rocket support, we'd really have something!
 
As mentioned, lots of potential and with the understanding that this is an open beta, I have high hopes it will be refined and perhaps expanded to handle a lot of needs on set. Has a lot of good things going for it right now. There are some issues as mentioned. What might be helpful is for people to list their system configs when providing feedback. Certainly there will be a difference using this on a MBP as opposed to a smoking fast brand new Mac Pro. So that type of info would be useful when assessing the feedback.
 
Back
Top