Cüneyt Kaya
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
- Messages
- 3,909
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- good old Berlin
- Website
- www.allahead.de
Would you care to elaborate on exactly why you're against this? Is it purely for opportunistic reasons, then please spare me the explanation.
I will most likely go with Stage 3 myself, but there's a possibility that I might be able to go with Stage 2. The economy is changing day by day and for the smaller players (like myself) there's no way of knowing if I'll have the money for a Stage 3 upgrade by the time the camera ships. I just lost a lot of money because someone who rented my camera for a feature last summer went bankrupt. If all the people who owed me money would just pay up then I wouldn't have a problem committing to Stage 2. Sometimes things just doesn't always work out so it would be nice with some options.
I can understand why RED wouldn't let us go down this path if it was bad for business, but I can't see that it is actually.
hey toni, i am doing stage 3 myself, so no oppurtunistic reasons.
things are rough these days, i know.
the better RED can plan and know the numbers, the faster the delivery of all cameras will happen (i hope).
I want Epic as fast as everybody else, but RED shouldnt be in the dark...they have to organise things too.
But maybe there would be a way the other way around...if people choose stage 3, but they suddenly earn some extra cash so they could afford stage 2, they could upgrade to stage 2 but without the benefit of getting the cam early....for example if a JULy/08 owner goes for stage 3 and a OCT/08 owner goes for stage 3 and the second one has suddenly more cash he will not get the stage 2 epic before the first one......to get it first you have to commit for stage 2 now