Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Epic & old glass

473519_10151110085990126_868994631_o.jpg


280330_10151110157745126_1569702558_o.jpg


More Peace...
 
6881144216_5d7005fd7c_z.jpg


A self portrait of an old favourite bit of glass. I use this cheap little Super Takumar for my personal shooting - I make no bones about stealing our Epic home for family and baby stuff, if its good for my clients, its good for me ;)

Its not rare or particularly weird, but its got a great combination of clarity and softness when wide open, and despite its tiny size the focus action is immaculate.

On a less vintage note, I really enjoy the look of the Nikon AI-S set I assembled recently. Again, not crazy off-the-wall weird, but not characterless and over-perfect. Lots of dreamy veiling wide open, and interesting focus fall off too.

Hey John, is that the older Super Tak 1.4 with the radioactive glass? Or the newer SMC one? Either way both lenses are supposed to be GREAT. I'm looking forward to playing with one soon. Great shot. True to form, they ARE supposed to flare wonderfully.
 
Last edited:
Edit: Rigt click for the big picture.

28mm Elmarit 1972

Colonne28.jpg


Eiffel28.jpg


Butte28.jpg



180mm Apo Telyt early 80's (can't remember exact date)

EiffelApo.jpg


ButteApo.jpg


PontApo.jpg


Best to all.
B.
 
28mm Elmarit 1972

Eiffel28.jpg


Butte28.jpg



180mm Apo Telyt early 80's (can't remember exact date)

EiffelApo.jpg


ButteApo.jpg


PontApo.jpg


Best to all.
B.

Brice these shots are awesome. They don't look dated at all, but also don't look hyper clean. It's a very nice balance. (The Leica's have very circular bokeh too, which I think helps them maintain a contemporary look).
 
Hey John, is that the older Super Tak 1.4 with the radioactive glass? Or the newer SMC one? Either way both lenses are supposed to be GREAT. I'm looking forward to playing with one soon. Great shot. True to form, they ARE supposed to flare wonderfully.

Its a 1971 SMC 55mm f1.8 I prefer it to the 50 1.4 for both image quality and physical feel. As I said, I use it almost exclusively for my personal images... mostly due to an odd sense of attachement and continuity: My Dad's family stills dating right back to the 70s have always been shot with glass just like this. He's since moved on and spends his retirement days hunting tiny bugs with lovely macro lenses and his Nikon... But the Pentax look says 'family album' to me, and its fun to continue it.
 
Its a 1971 SMC 55mm f1.8 I prefer it to the 50 1.4 for both image quality and physical feel. As I said, I use it almost exclusively for my personal images... mostly due to an odd sense of attachement and continuity: My Dad's family stills dating right back to the 70s have always been shot with glass just like this. He's since moved on and spends his retirement days hunting tiny bugs with lovely macro lenses and his Nikon... But the Pentax look says 'family album' to me, and its fun to continue it.

WOW. Funny, I was actually going to ask you if it was the 55 1.8. I've seen a lot of great pics taken with it (in particular with sunny, backlit flares...I guess it's good at it?). I totally understand about the nostalgia. I love how these old lenses can do that.
 
They don't look dated at all, but also don't look hyper clean. It's a very nice balance. (The Leica's have very circular bokeh too, which I think helps them maintain a contemporary look).

I'm not a lense expert, but the old leica's I have match with my most recent ones (not talking about noctilux) .
I have a nice set of nikon lenses but tend to leave them in their case now.
Apart the obvious better focusing factor Leica's lenses offer, their is somethig else who let me stay in....
Thanks Nick

@ Gunleik Groven
You are welcome.

Best to all
B.
 
...the old leica's I have match with my most recent ones (not talking about noctilux)

Hey Brice. Because the Leica lenses were designed for pros, one has to assume they put a premium on color matching the glass...even from one generation to the other.

I know Zeiss certainly had that approach - my Contax glass spans the same eras as Leica R's, and it all color matches.

One has to admire German engineering: all these lenses are built like tanks!
 
Thanks...

Wondering if I should just start a thread called Gunleiks Ramblings... Want to continue the RAW/Linear light thingy as a separate subject... But that might be the way to clean up my RedUser appearance... Hahahahaha
 
Why clean up your Reduser appearance now? The cat is already out of the bag. Keep on keeping on. Best thread in years IMHO.
 
Vance. THX... My cover is blown.

I am a mess...


277857_10151117209570126_1714332721_o.jpg


202596_10151117210065126_1809775682_o.jpg


621779_10151117211255126_243514274_o.jpg


412453_10151117211730126_352566696_o.jpg


616424_10151117212355126_1624448220_o.jpg


412464_10151117213070126_529581989_o.jpg


616746_10151117213745126_559691687_o.jpg


277868_10151117250025126_2029608446_o.jpg


Admittedly... Masters, Ultras, S4's or RPPs would have been better for these...
Still fun, though!

Cheers!

G
 
Back
Top