- Thread starter
- #81
Gunleik Groven
REDuser Sponsor
More Peace...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
![]()
A self portrait of an old favourite bit of glass. I use this cheap little Super Takumar for my personal shooting - I make no bones about stealing our Epic home for family and baby stuff, if its good for my clients, its good for me![]()
Its not rare or particularly weird, but its got a great combination of clarity and softness when wide open, and despite its tiny size the focus action is immaculate.
On a less vintage note, I really enjoy the look of the Nikon AI-S set I assembled recently. Again, not crazy off-the-wall weird, but not characterless and over-perfect. Lots of dreamy veiling wide open, and interesting focus fall off too.
28mm Elmarit 1972
![]()
![]()
180mm Apo Telyt early 80's (can't remember exact date)
![]()
![]()
![]()
Best to all.
B.
Hey John, is that the older Super Tak 1.4 with the radioactive glass? Or the newer SMC one? Either way both lenses are supposed to be GREAT. I'm looking forward to playing with one soon. Great shot. True to form, they ARE supposed to flare wonderfully.
Its a 1971 SMC 55mm f1.8 I prefer it to the 50 1.4 for both image quality and physical feel. As I said, I use it almost exclusively for my personal images... mostly due to an odd sense of attachement and continuity: My Dad's family stills dating right back to the 70s have always been shot with glass just like this. He's since moved on and spends his retirement days hunting tiny bugs with lovely macro lenses and his Nikon... But the Pentax look says 'family album' to me, and its fun to continue it.
They don't look dated at all, but also don't look hyper clean. It's a very nice balance. (The Leica's have very circular bokeh too, which I think helps them maintain a contemporary look).
...the old leica's I have match with my most recent ones (not talking about noctilux)