Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Great News Jim.
Can someone please demystify ONBOARD SSD!!!
When we're talking about higher frame rates, where will the bottleneck lie? In the data throughput or the ability of the camera to compress data at various levels? I'm wondering if 2.5:1 compression is more of a computational challenge than, say, 10:1 compression.
Backend is REDstation but it's important to remember that choosing the right REDcode rate for the right situations is key to a sensible workflow.
There's going to be a tendency to want to shoot at the highest redcode when a lower redcode is more valid and sensible.
There will be exceptions, but I think that RC50 will be more than enough for most situations.
Wait, so it is 2.5:1 compression that is mathematically lossless?!?!
I inmediatelly assumed that this could not be the rate of compression and remain mathematically lossless, so I assumed that he was refering to an aspect ratio...
2.5:1?!?! Are you serious Jim? Really? Please clarify cause that sounds too good to be true! When is RED going to get their first technical Oscar?![]()
Very good points. I'm hoping that REDstation expands to faster connections than SATA... things like SAS and USB 3.0 [when it matures]. As data rates increase more and more there will be increased demand for faster transfer speeds. The laptop will be a thing of the past for loading quite soon...
Could someone describe what a wavelet artifact looks like?
Lagarith Lossless codec offers roughly 4:1 on average for demanding video. In fact, for black/white sequences, I have noticed 10:1 or greater, with credits being more like 100:1. Overall, 5:1 sounds about right. And it is 100% lossless, free, and available online. Of course, it isn't really a capture format! 13.5 stops at the price level, however, is damn near worthy of a technical Oscar.
So 2.5:1 is the compression ratio, perhaps not so aggressive because of storage being so big and so that cheaper gear can deconstruct it?
EPIC has a REDCODE mathematically lossless compression option (2.5:1)
Just curiosity and to understand this precisely, should term "mathematically lossless" be understood literally implying the compression map is an identity? That is, when an image is compressed and decompressed the result is precisely the same image one started from at the first place.
The other possible interpretation is that the map is not an identity but the difference between the original and decompressed image is within some accuracy tolerance related to the hardware and consequently one may consider the difference is meaningless?
Whatever is the case all this is hairsplitting when it comes captured images. But, I love to understand what my (forthcoming) equipments really do.
He said "onboard SSD module", which I take to mean another module that accepts a form of SSD media. Hey, you know, like those RED MAG 128GB thingies we've all seen in the renders. So I'm ASSuming, you record to those, pop them off/out of the camera and plug it into the correct module on your RED STATION and away you go.
OK... you guys can go ahead and discuss all of this compression math stuff, as soon as someone tells me the actual size of the file... please!!! xP
If I'm not mistaken, it's about 190MB/s for 5K@24fps, assuming a 2:1 picture ratio.
So a 128GB SSD mag would last about 11 minutes...
Backend is REDstation
I'm guessing Red's SSDs will be SSD based modules designed for repeated docking, not just bare SSDs. Hence the need for RedStation to download.
So 190MB/s for uncompressed or already divided by 2.5?