AnthonyFlores
Well-known member
Hey all, I've been away from the forum for a really long time... but I have a 4k question that's been kinda burning a hole in my head, and thought I'd ask it here.
I was considering investing in a 4k TV, as the prices are getting closer to HD and within reason (such as the 65 inch Sony for 7k).
But my immediate question/concern is about CONTENT. I know Red and Odemax have plans, and I'm sure it will ultimately allow access to some mainstream Hollywood content--however, it seems that at least early on it will be focused on more independents and smaller filmmakers. Is this accurate? I could be wrong.
Of all the companies with 4k offerings, it seems that only Sony owns actual 4k content AND transparent/imminent plans for 4k delivery (their Video Unlimited has announced 7.99 rentals and 29.99 purchases--which is not bad, IMHO.)
Obviously, there are rumors about a 4k Apple TV--but Apple was late to even offering 1080p on iTunes--it's hard for me to imagine them quickly pushing to 4k content... then again, I'd love to be surprised. A 4k area of iTunes with movies and shows would be amazing
It seems Sony, by only allowing their player to work with their TV's, is essentially using their temporary 4k advantage to force early adoption of their stuff. And the other companies such as LG, Toshiba, Samsung and others have no content and are (maybe) waiting for 4k players/content from companies other than Sony to launch--while offering upscaling in the meanwhile.
Obviously, I know that long-term 4k will be as normal as 1080p and offered everywhere. But in the short term, for the next year or so, if you want native 4k big name Hollywood titles for rental or purchase, will Sony be the only game in town?
If so, their strategy just might work on me. I want a 4k TV but don't want to have to wait 12-18 mos to access an abundance of native 4k content.
Thoughts anyone?
Jeff? LOL.
Thanks in advance,
Anthony
I was considering investing in a 4k TV, as the prices are getting closer to HD and within reason (such as the 65 inch Sony for 7k).
But my immediate question/concern is about CONTENT. I know Red and Odemax have plans, and I'm sure it will ultimately allow access to some mainstream Hollywood content--however, it seems that at least early on it will be focused on more independents and smaller filmmakers. Is this accurate? I could be wrong.
Of all the companies with 4k offerings, it seems that only Sony owns actual 4k content AND transparent/imminent plans for 4k delivery (their Video Unlimited has announced 7.99 rentals and 29.99 purchases--which is not bad, IMHO.)
Obviously, there are rumors about a 4k Apple TV--but Apple was late to even offering 1080p on iTunes--it's hard for me to imagine them quickly pushing to 4k content... then again, I'd love to be surprised. A 4k area of iTunes with movies and shows would be amazing
It seems Sony, by only allowing their player to work with their TV's, is essentially using their temporary 4k advantage to force early adoption of their stuff. And the other companies such as LG, Toshiba, Samsung and others have no content and are (maybe) waiting for 4k players/content from companies other than Sony to launch--while offering upscaling in the meanwhile.
Obviously, I know that long-term 4k will be as normal as 1080p and offered everywhere. But in the short term, for the next year or so, if you want native 4k big name Hollywood titles for rental or purchase, will Sony be the only game in town?
If so, their strategy just might work on me. I want a 4k TV but don't want to have to wait 12-18 mos to access an abundance of native 4k content.
Thoughts anyone?
Jeff? LOL.
Thanks in advance,
Anthony