Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

DSMC3 Wish list

Some suggestions in here just seem unnecessary for a whole new infrastructure. What can't we do with the cameras we have now? Sure we can get more resolution, less noise, larger sensors but at this point in time, when we have the 8K Monstro, who really cares? A 10K full format sensor won't really be that big of a deal.

There's already a thread about this and I listed my picks for a next-gen camera system.

- Accurate per frame Z depth metadata at native resolution.
- Accurate camera tracking data for VFX (together with Z Depth you don't need greenscreens and don't need to do camera tracks in post)
- 18 stops of actual usable DR
- Clean of noise at ISO800 8K
- Lighter camera body
- Accurate tracking autofocus
Well said. the camera industry is due for modern updates, and not just “film replacement box”

Minor things like outputs and stuff can be solved, but these things would create a proper generational jump and would revolutionize filmmaking.
i whole heartedly disagree here. output lag on digital cameras are a big issue. improving the delay to monitor/evf is crucial going forward. Also, red royally f’d up their oled evf’s, and won’t admit it or fix it, and that is a disconcerting aspect of the brand. an attitude that puts off a lot of people around the world.

i do rarely see EVF’s on Fincher’s Red sets. My assumption, considering the timing of camera movements in their work is that fincher may avoid evf due to lag. idk, just a thought.

However, i do agree with you, fixing the OLED evf image quality should just be an easy firmware fix.
 
others have been very articulate about changes I'd like to see but I wanted to offer our perspective.

basically I am not sure the early day excitement can come back and I hope Red only do DSMC3 when it is really a jump forward..

When I was a much younger man I worked in the twilight world between 'film' and 'video'.. (some of my shoots where 35mm but more where S16 but far too many where on Sony beta variant cameras or the occasional Varicam etc... ).. the Red camera project (and to a lesser extent the Si2k which I also invested in) was a fucking revalution for me/us.. No longer did I have to muck around with ridiculous spinning mirrors relay systems or an edgy low res nasty image that needed a enormous amount of energy to trick a good image out off... So even though the 1st Red one was basically a 200asa camera with limited latitude, very odd colour and a restrictive frame rate (against a Arri 435 shooting some lovely Vision2) the opportunity in image to us twilight people was very exciting... it wasn't marketing or hype it was real tools that opened up opportunities!

then came the needed move to MX (faster iso with much better latitude)...
then the Epic... infinitely better frame rates and amazing opportunities due to size! and stability! and compression rates improvements!
Then Dragon... 1st really big jump re colour but GN had been improving things all along via software.... (but slight backwards step re black stability)
Then DSMC2... Dragon done properly!!!!
then everything else has been interesting clever steps that are often (depending on perspective) more like side steps... the only big innovations are in 2 areas! Sensitivity and Large format! and only one Red camera does it all!!! Monstro!
If someone can't create amazing images with a dragon chip they are the issue...

BUT also please let me say that Reds innovation with Price and Resolution is no longer interesting to me at all... and due to poor increases in CPU dev Wavelets at 8k are still a little too hard for too many people... (but the GPU stuff is working well but at 8k it is pretty demanding)

So back to DMC3... what would make me reach for my check book!

Big Chip (my preference would be 41mm x 24mm)... but I would take bigger even though my signatures don't cover ;-)
Camera size option not too much bigger than a monstro
Frame rates at S35 that clearly beat a Arri 435 ... 150fps+ if at 35mm for def and it if could go faster than 200fps for at least 5sec than would be great..
Clearly More latitude than every previous Red.. +1.5 more than monstro..
It can have slight less latitude in global shutter mode (but if the RS mode is fast I will never use it)
great colour finesse...
really stable chip with no smear!
Options on lower compression at higher frame rates
Behind the lens ND system that DOES NOT extend outwards further then the current OLPF (or please have a option to not have it)
Please stick a slightly better audio connector on the camera... (5 pin Lemo?)
I also don't think I want smaller pixels than Monster.

If the above is not possible now please don't do it until it is possible as I will for the very 1st time pass on the move... perhaps maybe inovate in the Komodo space until we can really jump forwards again with the flagship cameras!

Other improvements... please improve and finesse the GPU de-wavelets and maybe make redcode more efficient all around! I am really not sure I want us all to move to DCT with DSMC3..but I am happy it is a switchable camera option..
 
From our perspective, we just want some modern refinements. NOT looking for 12k:

-6k VV sensor, optimized for LL like gemini
-Flange distance closer to sensor for more mount/rear filt options
-Internal ND, space permitting
-More dynamic range
-Dual sensor readout, over global shutter if necessary
-Compatibility with dsmc2 modules*
-Faster UI, with a cleaner and more graphically oriented layout
-Same body shape, for integration with existing support and aks

And I completely agree with what Tom Gleeson said last year:

:yesnod: I should have put this first but real and powerful Autofocus is needed as demonstrated by the Sony FX9 and Canon C500mk2. This is a potential Achilles heel for Red as Sony and Canon are leveraging their R&D and experience with DSLR AF with tools like advanced face and eye tracking tools for focus. Do not misunderstand me as I am not suggesting AF that works idependantly of the operator like some dumb old video camera. I'm talking about powerful tools that allow the operator to decide where focus should be and the camera does it. I would guess that Sony FX9 AF tech will end up in the Venice Mk2 and when people understand just how "efficient" this tool can be cameras with only manual focus will be behind the eight ball. Red should not ignore this issue in 2020


Pipe dreams - internal OLPF wheel...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top