James Sielaff
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Messages
- 587
- Reaction score
- 48
- Points
- 28
Well said. the camera industry is due for modern updates, and not just “film replacement box”Some suggestions in here just seem unnecessary for a whole new infrastructure. What can't we do with the cameras we have now? Sure we can get more resolution, less noise, larger sensors but at this point in time, when we have the 8K Monstro, who really cares? A 10K full format sensor won't really be that big of a deal.
There's already a thread about this and I listed my picks for a next-gen camera system.
- Accurate per frame Z depth metadata at native resolution.
- Accurate camera tracking data for VFX (together with Z Depth you don't need greenscreens and don't need to do camera tracks in post)
- 18 stops of actual usable DR
- Clean of noise at ISO800 8K
- Lighter camera body
- Accurate tracking autofocus
i whole heartedly disagree here. output lag on digital cameras are a big issue. improving the delay to monitor/evf is crucial going forward. Also, red royally f’d up their oled evf’s, and won’t admit it or fix it, and that is a disconcerting aspect of the brand. an attitude that puts off a lot of people around the world.Minor things like outputs and stuff can be solved, but these things would create a proper generational jump and would revolutionize filmmaking.
i do rarely see EVF’s on Fincher’s Red sets. My assumption, considering the timing of camera movements in their work is that fincher may avoid evf due to lag. idk, just a thought.
However, i do agree with you, fixing the OLED evf image quality should just be an easy firmware fix.