Nick Morrison
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 9,141
- Reaction score
- 50
- Points
- 48
- Location
- Brooklyn
- Website
- www.smallgiant.tv
The problem with the smaller frame size it's hard to get wider angles, and you end up with deeper depth of field.
However, if RED were to down-sample like other companies, it creates other problems. If the sensor line-skips (literally ignoring pixels from the sensor) it creates moire and other aberrations.
I would bet money, in amounts I don't have, that RED wouldn't utilize line-skipping, because of the visual aberrations that it causes.
So this means that Red Raw 1280x720 at 60 fps without a cropped sensor on Scarlet: won't happen.
You can shoot 2k and then down rez in post, but again, smaller sensor = more telephoto on every lens that you have.
Can the HDMI or SDI output at 60p? The standards certainly can, but is there the right circuitry behind the taps on the Scarlet to allow such a thing from just a firmware update? I have no idea. But I wouldn't sit around losing work, HOPING that RED will do something about it. It sucks, but you happen to be in a rare case that RED doesn't have covered. The simplest solution? Buy another camera that does what you clients need. If they need it as much as you say they do, then it'll pay for itself pretty quickly.
But a way around this is to use 16mm lenses, which are much wider, and usually very light and very fast (benefits of a small image circle)