Scott Miller
Well-known member
I also got a CZ 50 F1.4 that I haven't tried. Looks like I should drag it out and give it a try!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I also got a CZ 50 F1.4 that I haven't tried. Looks like I should drag it out and give it a try!!
Very nice set. But 10k is much too much for rehousing like that. I can do it for: lens + some $$$![]()
how much for a 50 1.4 and 35 2.8 if i send the lenses?
Good to know, Nick! That lens was not really on my radar. Not sure how often I'd use a 200, but sounds like something to consider...Hey guys, I recently got a Contax 200mm 3.5, and I have to say...David W. Jones was right...it's a pretty impressive lens. I was wrong to ever pooh pooh it. The bokeh is absolutely gorgeous. Much more painterly and wondrous than the more exacting 180 2.8.
I was also lucky to get a very old, mint copy, an AE with serial in the 58s (from KEH), and it has all the magic I've come to love from the very early Contax's.
would the contax zeiss planar lenses qualify as this series, or is that a different model?
would the contax zeiss planar lenses qualify as this series, or is that a different model?
EDIT:
Also, how do you mount them to your Epics/Scarlets? Must they be remounted to EF or PL?
It would be a lenses optical design. For Example...
Planar
Sonnar
Tessar
Distagon
Protar
I find the cheaper adapters start to have movement in them after a bit of use. I've shimmed one so it's pretty solid but come payday I may finally invest in some leitax adapters.
Okay... but do all these lenses have the same coatings as the superspeeds?