Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Just to make you feel better, the original 3k-for-$3k camera's specs included a 4.8-inch LCD (not the smaller one) and dual CF slots (not the single slot on the side).is it me or did "3k for $3k" just jump to "3k for $(who knows)k"
Think about it. Why on earth would you throw away $4k+ for a JVC/SONY/PANASONIC/CANON videocamera when you can get a DSLR that gets you better results for half the price?
a) Form factor
b) Some of them have advanced (pricier) I/O interfaces.
c) Some have pro Audio
d) is there anything else? And I'm not even listing their weak points.
I think that's not accurate. At least in broadcast, cameras in 720p format came out AFTER cameras in 1080i.
But as 1080i sales remained in the tank, it was time to try something else. Once proven there was an HD market 1080i got a second chance, but when it failed again, manufacturers thought that 1080p might do the trick. Since then we have had pixel-shifting, up-conversion, 1440 horizontal sampling, 1-chip 1920 x 1080 CMOS sensors, and now line-skip DSLR downconversion pretending to be 1080p.
So slow progress. Now you may say I'm biased; but you can judge the quality difference for yourself when Scarlet is here.
Mauricio De la Orta;487913 EXT. CSPJ Building - Moments later The evil marketing exec comes out of a door carrying a box with books and papers in it. He looks right and sees a Billboard. He discovers it is announcing the new FF Scarlet fixed lens for only 3 said:This is a dream sequence right?
I can see RED possibly shifting to an S35 scarlet at a lowball price using Mysterium-X chips that were rejected for bad pixels (masked of course), but doubt if Full frame sensor.
CUT TO:...
EXT. CSPJ Building - Moments later
The evil marketing exec comes out of a door carrying a box with books and papers in it. He looks right and sees a Billboard. He discovers it is announcing the new FF Scarlet fixed lens for only 3,500 usd.
A RED spot shines in his eye. The camera moves away to reveal his angry expression.
Many worry about everything... it is human nature. We feel like we have a pretty good track record so far (except for meeting schedules). Relax until we give you a real reason to worry. Some things will go up, some will go down. Since "everything has changed" since last November it is time to wipe that from your mind and prepare for the final pricing.
Jim
In short, whatever happens, the DSMCs will be worth every penny.![]()
Sadly if the price of the Fixed Scarlet raises too much, many of the potential buyers will jump to VDSLRs and diss RED.
Sad thing indeed.
Yes it does : )"...prepare for the final pricing."
This does not sound good.
Sadly if the price of the Fixed Scarlet raises too much, many of the potential buyers will jump to VDSLRs and diss RED.
Sadly if the price of the Fixed Scarlet raises too much, many of the potential buyers will jump to VDSLRs and diss RED.
Sad thing indeed.
I guess there are various thresholds for being screwed. All I know is that the only price increase relative to Scarlet is for the fixed 2/3-inch, whose price has increased 25% ($750) since its original design (for the basic kit). But the basic kit reportedly has only one CF slot (vs. the original's two slots), probably the smaller LCD (vs. the original's 4.8-inch), and no HD-SDI port (HD-SDI was specced for the original Scarlet). If this is true, it might bring the the fixed's cost to $5,000 to $6,000 to match the original Scarlet's functionality. I consider a 66% to 100% price increase screwing us, at least relative to the hyped price of the original design. But that's just me. And the original was specced to support Redcode up to 100 MBps rather than only 42 MBps. I'm expecting a further price increase for the fixed Scarlet, which would be questionable in this economy.So logic would figure that cameras & accessories produced en masse = cheaper (in general, not necessarily from the original quoted prices and especially considering how 'limited' the run was on R1) but have a little faith - They've come this far in two years - they're not going to screw us now.
I guess there are various thresholds for being screwed. All I know is that the only price increase relative to Scarlet is for the fixed 2/3-inch, whose price has increased 25% ($750) since its original design (for the basic kit). But the basic kit reportedly has only one CF slot (vs. the original's two slots), probably the smaller LCD (vs. the original's 4.8-inch), and no HD-SDI port (HD-SDI was specced for the original Scarlet). If this is true, it might bring the the fixed's cost to $5,000 to $6,000 to match the original Scarlet's functionality. I consider a 66% to 100% price increase screwing us, at least relative to the hyped price of the original design. But that's just me. And the original was specced to support Redcode up to 100 MBps rather than only 42 MBps. I'm expecting a further price increase for the fixed Scarlet, which would be questionable in this economy.
Steve Gibby said:One of Jim Jannard's key traits is fairness - he consistently under-promises and over-delivers.
As one of the very first customers of RED, along with my friends Mark Pedersen, Blair, Billy, Shawn, Dino, and many others, I'd like to say that RED has always priced their products at a very generous level to their customers. The performance to price ratio of RED One, and the RED lenses has been nothing short of phenomenal!
One of Jim Jannard's key traits is fairness - he consistently under-promises and over-delivers. Those of you on this thread complaining about prices of products, when they haven't even been finalized and posted, need to seriously step back two squares, re-evaluate your attitudes, and just hold on until the prices are finalized - and when they are, I guarantee you they will be at a good, fair price level.
A fiscally healthy RED company benefits us all - let's not begrudge them their just revenue. All of my friends on RED Team absolutely bust their asses 20 hours a day, seven days a week, to crank out these great products for us. We need to thank them for their efforts, and realize that they absolutely deserve to make a good living for what they do.
I own RED One serial number 0008 and two other very, very early REDs - and I couldn't be happier with RED's prices and customer service.
Please think before you post your product price worries - and realize that whatever the prices are they will be set at a more than fair level. RED has more than earned our respect - let's give it to them.
RED has always been more than fair with us...and I never see that changing...
Just sayin'...
I guess there are various thresholds for being screwed. All I know is that the only price increase relative to Scarlet is for the fixed 2/3-inch, whose price has increased 25% ($750) since its original design (for the basic kit). But the basic kit reportedly has only one CF slot (vs. the original's two slots), probably the smaller LCD (vs. the original's 4.8-inch), and no HD-SDI port (HD-SDI was specced for the original Scarlet). If this is true, it might bring the the fixed's cost to $5,000 to $6,000 to match the original Scarlet's functionality. I consider a 66% to 100% price increase screwing us, at least relative to the hyped price of the original design. But that's just me. And the original was specced to support Redcode up to 100 MBps rather than only 42 MBps. I'm expecting a further price increase for the fixed Scarlet, which would be questionable in this economy.
I'm expecting a further price increase for the fixed Scarlet, which would be questionable in this economy.