danbrazda
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2008
- Messages
- 208
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Age
- 66
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Website
- www.vcutvhd.com
So please enlighten me. I have a 30" Apple Cinema Display and the new Panasonic 25.5" Studio Monitor. I am told by many that the color accuracy of the Panasonic is what I should be basing my CC decisions on. My experience so far is the opposite.
The Panasonic is supposed to be 10-Bit and the Apple 8-bit yet the Apple display is FAR SHARPER than the Panny. Also- the Panasonic is much more pastel with regard to color saturation than the Apple in any given shot.
The Panny is setup in Studio/post gamma and the Apple Display is setup at 2.2 gamma (yes I have also tried the advanced custom setup procedure). My final product ends up in 1080P (for now) and when I correct for the Apple Display vs the Panny Display, what I see broadcast is more accurate to the Apple Display. I know there are factors beyond my control on the transmission end BUT.... is there anyone else out there that feels the Apple Cinema Display is MORE accurate than the new Panny 25.5" or other so-called CC monitors?
The Panasonic is supposed to be 10-Bit and the Apple 8-bit yet the Apple display is FAR SHARPER than the Panny. Also- the Panasonic is much more pastel with regard to color saturation than the Apple in any given shot.
The Panny is setup in Studio/post gamma and the Apple Display is setup at 2.2 gamma (yes I have also tried the advanced custom setup procedure). My final product ends up in 1080P (for now) and when I correct for the Apple Display vs the Panny Display, what I see broadcast is more accurate to the Apple Display. I know there are factors beyond my control on the transmission end BUT.... is there anyone else out there that feels the Apple Cinema Display is MORE accurate than the new Panny 25.5" or other so-called CC monitors?