Rob Ruffo
Well-known member
Why would I hate on anyone Michael? I just think that the opening of this thread was kind of strange for a "good contributor." I'd expect that from a new guy like myself. I like tests like anyone else but they need to be unbiased. Rodney Charters is not a member of any forum that I know of but he is a known professional. If he was a member here going on about this camera is better than that camera then his credibility would have been lost with me. But since he's not, and has nothing to lose or gain from examples like above, then I'll take a chance and trust that he's doing what he can to get the best out of all the cameras he's testing. That's why I made the comment above.
But going back to my first question...really...what is the point of Sanjin's test? Why are we comparing a $1,700 camera against a $30,000+ camera? I'm not sure what the point is. We can see what the RC folks are trying to do....but I have no idea where this is going? Looking in from outside the box it just seems to me like the message is "my cam is better than yours." And if that's not the case then I go back to my original question...what's the purpose? The Red cam is a professional cinema camera....why on earth would someone try and compare that to a consumer DSLR that happens to record video? You see what I'm saying?
I've seen so many flame wars against different camera owners in other forums that I had to jump in here and ask the question....why!!??
It's about deepening tech knowledge, and understanding WHY it is so much more (although $30 000 is a bit high, you can get a working cam for way less than that.0. By picking out flaws and quality differences in 7D footage, we all learn more about what makes a great cam.