Roberto Lequeux
Well-known member
Detail without sharpening. Smooth accurate gradients. Take a look at the leading face of the table where the light stands. Resolution gives you so much more than a "sharp" looking image.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
but you're mistaking something. A VHS of Blade Runner was shot on native resolution much higher (let's say around 4k film resolution) and then subsequently down rezzed through the various DI methods to result in that final VHS resolution which itself might be 640x480 or whatever. But as we all know something shot on much higher resolution but then down sampled, looks far better than something shot at that native resolution. This is why Red footage shot at 4k down sampled to 2k still looks much sharper than let's say Alexa or DSLR footage that is near 2k.
Similarly a 640x480 VHS version of Blade Runner originally shot/scanned at 4k 35mm film, will look far better than a 1980x1080 DSLR footage down sampled to that same 640x480 so even if you're watching it on a crappy down sample like VHS, it is still looking far better if it was shot at a high original resolution
He he.We have so many uses for "film look". Some even include good composition, lighting, set design, etc... But you are absolutely right. A more literal use of "film look" would come down to DR and color reproduction, and perhaps a little grain.
The very outdated and, sadly, rather American notion that there always has to be a "winner" and a "loser" is getting very tiresome, particularly in an age that is bringing us technical and artistic tools and choices we never dreamed we'd have.
a few comments....
First, the only people who referred to this presentation as a "shootout," or even worse " The Great Camera Shootout 2011" are people on RedUser.
Mike,
To my knowledge, the only website officially posting images, test results, and comments from the evaluation is this one, http://www.zacuto.com/. The heading above the video reads "Featured Video - The Great Camera Shootout 2011: SCCE ~ Episode 1: 'The Tipping Point.'" The clip (what Zacuto is referring to as a documentary about the evaluation) begins with big red flash on titles: THE...GREAT...CAMERA...SHOOTOUT...2011. Bob Primes and the rest of the evaluation team are named as members of the "Shootout Crew." So the nomenclature is not originating with redusers.
In that case, I'll probably forward my post here - verbatim - to the Zacuto group, because when the evaluation was presented by Bob and the group who participated in making it, it was most definitely NOT characterized that way. Quite the opposite, in fact. And I greatly prefer it the way Bob presented it, without the confrontational atmosphere that calling it a "shootout" almost instantly creates.
Thanks for letting me know about the Zacuto page.
Sanjin is the only reduser I recall using the word "winner," but I don't think he's an American.
The very outdated and, sadly, rather American notion that there always has to be a "winner" and a "loser" is getting very tiresome,...


With respect to the SCCE DR evaluation, I think the tricky point came with the bar chart that was part of the video. It showed Alexa at 14.1 stops and MX at 11.3. This is contrary to a great deal of information, including some from Graeme that has appeared in various forums previously which pegged MX within a half or full stop of Alexa.